Thursday, September 29, 2011

Eatock versus Bolt decision

It seems that we are able to talk in generalizations, but not specifics!
Here is the link to the Eatock v Bolt (2011) FCA 1103 (28 September, 2011) Federal Court of Australia ruling.
Perhaps all people who have been hurt, insulted or intimated by what anyone else says should have the right to an apology. Sorry? Is that what we are all looking for, or do we want the debate to continue? I have so many issues with this case and the judgment I don't even know where to begin! Perhaps Steve said it better. Anyway, for the readers information there have been 522 views of my article 'Andrew Bolt/Bindi Cole/Indigenous Politics' and 20 comments since I posted it on this blog on 7 April 2011.

1 comment:

  1. if I see another reference to Milton and Aerophagica I'll throw up :) Lists of banned books and websites are secret in Australia, unlike the Index Expurgatorius