Thursday, April 7, 2011

Andrew Bolt/Bindi Cole/Indigenous politics, Black Lives Matter

I am still struggling with the complex issues raised by the Andrew Bolt trial. I work with mixed-heritage Indigenous students and understand the relationship they have with family and country. I understand the legacy they inherited from invasion and dispossession. I understand their struggle of being betwixt and between in a country that divides 'blackfella' from 'whitefella'. But really, Dylon Bird's article in this morning's Age doesn't make things any clearer. Firstly, there is a reason why definitions of Aboriginality has shifted from biological determinism to social, community and cultural aspects and part of this reason is because it would be extremely difficult for any pale skinned aboriginal, such as those individuals mentioned in Andrew Bolt's article, to prove by genetic testing that they are of aboriginal descent. Secondly, I think he's misguided if he thinks that Bindi Cole's art is not 'political'. When she constructed the photo (above) of her family members, their faces covered with black paint, she was drawing attention to the fact that although she has fair skin she identifies as aboriginal - her paternal grandmother is part of the Stolen Generation. Cole's art draws attention to the fluidity of the indigenous person and that's admirable, but it also acutely addresses the ongoing struggle within Indigenous culture about individuals accused of being 'coconuts' - black on the outside, but white on the inside - an inversion of what Cole presented in her photograph. There's a certain contempt by dark skinned aboriginals for those with light skin who can pass for being white and who managed to avoid the prejudice, discrimination and resulting poverty of those called 'coon, 'boong' or 'Abo' (in the 60s and 70s), but who more recently (in the past two decades) claim their aboriginal heritage whilst gaining more opportunities. I find Cole's black face paint 'mask of aboriginality' troubling because it blatantly recalls the black face makeup used in 19th Century minstrel shows that created a stereotype of the American negro and because it appears divisive since it makes problematic the notion of authentic or counterfeit aboriginals. This emphasis on the 'real' or 'not real' has become prominent in recent times, especially in relation to our Prime Minister and concern as to whether or not we are seeing the 'real' Julia. The 'real' appears always as that which is hidden and all we have to do is somehow uncover it! When white performers covered their faces in black shoe polish in minstrel shows they were appropriating not only the culture (music, song and dance) of the American negro, but were also proliferating negative attitudes ascribed to them, such as servitude, primitiveness or simple mindedness. There is a confusing aspect to Cole's work in which she, as a fair skinned aboriginal is covering her face with black identity to represent her inner aboriginal heritage, which she, by her very act ascribes to skin color. A paradox exists here, either the aboriginal identity is about skin color or it isn't! I would be less troubled if a dark skinned aboriginal painted their face white! In the latter we might at least see that the mask represents the 'blackfella' whitewashed by our culture and that the eugenic policies of the 1937 Aboriginal Welfare Initial Conference of Commonwealth and State Aboriginal Authorities, the aims of which were: (a) To educate to white standard, children of the detribalized living near centers of white population, and subsequently to place them in employment in lucrative occupations, which will not bring them into economic or social conflict with the white community; (b) To keep the semi-civilized under a benevolent supervision in regard to employment, social and medical service in their own tribal areas. Small local reserves selected for tribal suitability should be provided in these tribal areas where unemployable natives may live as nearly as possible a normal tribal life, and unobjectionable tribal ceremonies may continue and to which employees may repair when unemployed. The ultimate destiny of these people should be their elevation to class (a); (c) To preserve as far as possible the uncivilized native in his normal tribal state by the establishment of inviolable reserves; each State or Territory determining for itself whether mission activities should be conducted on these reserves and the conditions under which they may be permitted. This has been almost fully enacted, with the exception of aboriginals from Western Australia, Northern Territory, South Australia and parts of Queensland who have not yet been westernized. I'm left wondering whether art, such as that made by Bindi Cole does anything to draw attention to the plight of these aborigines who live in regional and remote Australia and are still thought of as 'Abos', still considered inferior because of negative stereotypes generated about them in the media and who, according to a recent survey, still suffer from gross discrimination when they come to our cities. I hope that if nothing else, the Andrew Bolt case will further the discussion surrounding treatment of Indigenous peoples regardless of the color of their skin. 
As of 3pm 27 August, 2013 there has been 2.317 page views of this article.
Google Analytics shows that as at 12 March, 2014 there has been 2814 page views of this article. As of 6 July 2020, 3003 people have read this

27 comments:

  1. My son Erin sent the following response via email, and I quote:

    Actually, the issue of social discrimination, isolation, and inequality of opportunity also exists everywhere. Western suburbs vs Eastern suburbs. Fat vs thin. "good looking" vs "not so good looking". Monetary wealth etc.
    The unfortunate thing about politics and welfare, is that if a group can be stereotyped and "grouped" they can be the recipient of government issued welfare payments/programs. If you don't fit the box, you are out on your own, irrespective of race. The decision faced by us all is which box we wish to place ourselves in. With whom and which group we wish to align ourselves with. Life is not easy for anyone. No matter where your social standing, you will always at some point or another cop some form of abuse or negative attitude from another based on a real or perceived difference.
    We are all guilty of it at some time in our lives. Whether fair or unfair, it appears to be human nature. Its a matter of choosing to have a thick skin and getting on with it or falling into the trap that others set for you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Cole's point is that she is subverting a stereotype. Turning herself and her family into the stereotype that she feels everyone wants to see. Her use of an old visual racist cue is purposefully done to highlight the racism that is inherent in ascribing to only one true type of Aboriginal experience...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, it didn't work for me!
    Why would she think that 'everyone' wants to see fair skinned aboriginals this way? Isn't it she who wants to be perceived as black - wasn't this the point of the artwork?
    And who is this group you define as 'everyone'?
    I'm sure the 'aboriginality" experienced by those of mixed heritage brought up with 'white' privilege is entirely different to those aboriginals with dark skin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And there you have it. That there is only one type of Aboriginal experience. That if you are not brought up in remote communities suffering from disadvantage then you are not Aboriginal. It's not about disadvantage. I don't think her artwork ever was. It was about other people denying her heritage for precisely the reason you bring up. I believe she was aware that people think like you do and she is playing on it. I don't believe that the artwork is about her wanting to be perceived as black at all. I believe it's about breaking down stereotypes and creating discourse around this attitude of one singular Aboriginal experience...

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's NOT what I was saying. I know and have worked with aboriginal people with fair skin and I know that they have varied experiences, and I would never challenge anyone's aboriginality based on heritage. The whole idea here was to open up discourse. Since you were the only person who made a comment you have been vital in this exchange, which has been read and followed by others, and I thank you for helping to flesh out some of the issues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I realise it has been awhile since the last comments on here but Julie, but I wanted to somewhat agree with you. As a black skinned Aboriginal, I find Bindi Cole, her work and her words highly offensive. Especially when she mentioned in another article (and I quote)
    "I’m from Victoria and I’ve always known this. All the descendants of traditional Victorian Aboriginal people are now of mixed heritage. I’m not black. I’m not from a remote community. Does that mean I’m not really Aboriginal?"

    All the descendants of traditional Victorian Aboriginal people are NOT of mixed heritage. I'm tired of white people like Bindi Cole, who win award after award as she is a palatable Indigenous person for the media to covet, who offend their so called 'kin' whilst at the same time declaring themselves as some sort of Authority on Aboriginality. Come down to my homelands in Gippsland. Plenty of 'full-bloods' down there.

    Bindi Cole is an offensive, opportunistic traitor to my culture. I'm tired of being politically correct, I'm tired of hearing how white aboriginals are so downtrodden and 'with us in the struggle', when they are the ones profiting most from our culture and that very struggle, all the while insisting they are just as deserving of assistance as those really struggling, really suffering from racism and injustice that directly affects life opportunities.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for your comment. I know that this is an extremely emotional subject and I value your candor. 'We' rarely hear the voice of aboriginal people(s) who are affected by the words and actions of mixed-race indigenous individuals and who are (mostly) overlooked in discourses that appear in the media.
    I agree with your statement that there are aboriginals who are 'really struggling, really suffering from racism and injustice' and we all have a part to play in trying to overcome these violations.
    I'm no expert, but it seems to me that one way around the problem is to ensure that full-blood aboriginals are afforded the same advantages as mixed-heritage and non-indigenous Australians.
    Racism is endemic in Australia and elsewhere and continues to be a real problem.
    Educational systems and those who teach in them must surely take the issue of racism on board to attempt to make some difference to the public psyche. Unfortunately this will take time and the divide between black and white, indigenous and non-indigenous people will continue to cause conflict and confusion.
    It is obvious to most that mixed-race indigenous people have had more opportunities, more education and less racism than their darker skinned counterparts and are in a better position to be able to opportunistic and expert when it comes to making applications for funding, particular in the arts. We can't blame them for taking the opportunities given to them, it is their right. However, it is also the right of those who are struggling, to be heard and to be assisted. I can only say to you that some people ARE listening.
    (The post prior to this one was removed because I found spelling errors).

    ReplyDelete
  9. I tried to approach Bindi Cole about this directly. I wanted her to retract her statement, that basically says I am dead. That my great grandmother was a lie, that many of my family is a lie. That is just, offensive to the core. I've spent my whole life being identified, not choosing to identify, because of how dark I am.

    Thats the biggest slap in the face. She has no end of supporters saying 'oh, let her be offensive, she is trying to give the middle finger to those who try to define her heritage' who seem nonplussed by the fact Bindi herself, by her very words, is making bold declarations about the heritage of her supposed 'brothers and sisters'.

    She didn't seem to want to hear it. My comments were deleted from any public view she had control of, and I just felt shut down. It doesn't matter that I rang the Koori Heritage Trust who have archived information from the mission where my family were born, here in Victoria, nobody seems to want to touch these untouchables.

    And I'm a lucky black man. I grew up the white world, fostered to a white family and got an education. I get social breakdown, disadvantage, the system. I've lived it. I've buried more family than I care to count, my own brother before his 40th birthday. And you know what? I'm luckier than 99% of my black brothers out there. I can spell, read and have internet access.

    There is no way I blame people for being opportunistic either, I mean, how many people handed back the stimulus payment and said 'you know what, I don't really need this'. That is just human nature, however, that is why we need rules and regulations. That is how we stop this corruption. I'm not saying we need to go back to classifying ourselves necessarily by 'castes' as in the old system, but it does warrant a closer look when the ones complaining most about a classification system of sorts are the ones with the least cultural links, and, the most to lose financially.

    Thank you for such an open and honest dialogue with me on this Julie. It is nice to feel heard sometimes!

    p.s I do not have a google account, so apologies, I can only select anonymous post for some reason?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear Anon, I'm sorry that you've had that experience, especially from people who say that they are connected to the indigenous community.
    I can understand your grief about the death of indigenous Australians who have a life expectancy of 25 years less than non-indigenous Australians, the primary reasons being: poverty, poor nutrition and housing, lack of education, which contributes to lack of employment, racism and the government's inability to address problems. I have no solutions, but dialogue is one way that we can keep the issues alive.

    ReplyDelete
  11. And I think that's why works like those of Bindi Cole are really important. They help to create and continue dialogue where it may not otherwise be present. To many the issues of racism and discrimination in Australian society are a total non-factor because they never need see or feel the effects. Works like Cole’s, as well as the dialogue created by them here, help to let some of us know that these issues are real and they really affect people’s lives.

    Of course, voices such as yours, Anon, should be heard as loud and clear. Just as I feel I have learned something from Bindi Cole’s artwork, I have learned something from your comments here today.

    For me, what Cole’s work symbolises is not what she wants her identity to be or what she wants us to see in her, but that you can never know the identity of another based on their exterior.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ella, thanks you for your comment.
    I would like to add that Cole's work 'provokes' dialogue, rather than 'creates' it, for there is certainly valuable discussions occurring in many arenas about significant issues that need to be addressed in regards to indigenous Australians in this society. Because Cole is a public figure her artworks and what she 'says' in her works are elevated above those have not been afforded a voice. I can only hope that many more aboriginal people can shed their anonymity and become, like Bindi Cole significant subjects worthy of good health care, education, employment, housing and community interest.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bindi Cole is a total fraud. She was not raised in the Aboriginal community. There are many people high profile people who have Aboriginal heritage such as Ray Martin and Sam Riley but whilst they acknowledge their ancestry the accept that it was not their experience and try to effect change for those people who did grow up identified within the community. It is one thing to know what you are but it is another to know what you are not. Bindi Cole should be ashamed of herself for taking away from the real lived reality for Aboriginal people who have grown up aware of their Aboriginality, identified and accepted within their community, who have seen the world like this from the day they where born regardless of physical appearance. I can tell by the tense with which she refers to her own Aboriginality that she grew up white, it's a dead give away. Shame on her!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am interested in your statement that Bindi Cole takes 'away from the real lived reality for Aboriginal people...'. Is it that you think that art audiences and the general public will see her perspective as the only relevant one and that aboriginals who are 'aware of their Aboriginality' and who are 'identified and accepted within their community' are somehow silenced or not seen by her artwork. There are certainly complex issues to come to grips with here. It sounds to me like you are saying that aboriginality is based on direct and lived experience of the culture, not just a claim to a DNA connection? Any further comments - anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes you are very accurate in saying that Julie, it is about lived experience and community acceptance and DNA, this is legislated. The terrain though has become slippery and frankly the Aboriginal community are way too nice and mostly occupied with daily hardships to deal with someone like Cole. If she knew what it was like for identified Aboriginal people you would see this sensitivity and honesty in her frankly 'awful' work, however it is not there at all. The use of the red headbands which belongs to central desert men for ceremony is an obvious sign that she has no understanding of life and lore for our people and is highly inappropriate. Her work is about the fact that white people don't accept her as 'Aboriginal and why should they? She tells us nothing about her life as an 'Aboriginal' woman, her culture? Her recent works rely on a black aesthetic which is not her own, she is aware that this has 'currency' though. I am really shocked by the audacity of this person and find her crude and opportunistic, i pray that non Indigenous audience cotton onto this as well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi Julie, its your original 'Angry Black Dude' (I decided I liked blogging, you inspired me!) again of the previous Anon comments.

    To the last poster, thank you. I neglected to mention the headbands originally, this was another item of great offence to me as for our Elders, these types of headwear are significant identifiers that distinguish them in ceremonies and traditional practices from those who have not attained such a dignified and special status.

    Claim to a DNA connection in itself is not good enough. When you are taking the smallest strands of your heritage to identify yourself, there is something intrinsically wrong in my opinion. Sadly, it is White Aborigines who seem to legislate the smallest skerrick of bloodline so it translates into opportunities and money for their family and friends. Have a look at someone like Misty Jenkins. Go on, google the name and I'll wait.

    She is the whitest of white women. Yet, she received some incredibly prestigious scholarships worth upwards of six figures in total. She is very smart, I am not saying she is stupid, but, she is hardly disadvantaged, hardly indigenous and it is playing both sides. When all the media reports come out about the 'Indigenous wastage', who gets heckled on the street? The black people. Not Misty Jenkins, not Bindi Cole, not any White Aborigine. They get all the profit and none of the taxpayer dissent. It hardly seems fair.

    But, what of those who cry - but if it didn't go to Misty Jenkins, the money would be wasted! How? Why? Is there no provision to hold over the scholarship and funding until a suitable disadvantaged Indigenous student can be found?

    The problem is that we aren't getting enough black Aboriginal kids coming through the school system!! Well, lets fix that. Lets actually fund the schools properly, lets actually provide incentives to those in the worst areas. In 99% of cases in my homelands, it has nothing to do with parents being alcohol or substance dependant and everything to do with the appalling rates of funding for teachers, literacy and numeracy programs, adequate public transport access and vehicle access and a whole host of other very fixable problems that are ignored and overlooked time and time again. The money is just swallowed by and endless ream of bureaucrats who purport to be helping but are really part of the problem.

    The thing is, my daughter is black skinned. I can't very well ask her to look up to someone like Misty Jenkins as a role model. How can Misty really 'get' my daughters struggle? She can't. People like Bob Bellear should be hailed over people like Misty Jenkins as great Indigenous achievers.

    We also have the problem of Indigenous Corporations and Bodies being littered with these Professional Aborigines (Bolt did have a point with that title) who have the smallest traceable bloodline to a culture and are now, in effect, running the show. Claiming to speak on behalf of ALL Indigenous people, when that is so far from the truth it is frightening. If you question the Board, you get your Membership application rejected or refused, so where is the chance to provide a dissenting voice for the real black people? It is legislated away because the Professional Aborigines have permeated nearly every place of power!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Whether someone has dark skin or not is irrelevant. There are many Aboriginal people of fair complexion and to polarise identity is unfair and simplifies the notion of Aboriginal culture as multi cultural concept, which it is. White Australian people contrary to popular belief are aware of Aboriginal culture and have a history themselves of 'spotting' blacks, so fair skin will not always deflect racist intentions or make life easier especially in rural areas, often people target fair skinned people as easier targets. I do also think there is a difference between 'light' and 'white', Cole belongs to the latter! Once again it is about the three tier approach of dna, community acceptance and self identification your whole life. Misty Jenkins has copped a lot of flack but you can tell she is Gunditjmarra if you know Koorie people, you just gotta look at here face, her eyes, her Mum is Aboriginal and she is way more relevant and real than Bindi Cole, at least Misty always knew she is koorie unlike Bindi Cole who is a total Johnny come lately.. Misty can be a role model for young Aboriginal kids but it needs to be explained that there are different types of Indigenous experience. "Misty's Mum is a Koorie, her Dad is white" The struggle for Misty is yes probably different but still hard, i am sure the internal fight is the same, growing up in rural Victoria being told you are not as good as the others because your Mum is a koorie or not being accepted by some Koories because you are fair, get what i mean? Her Mum has done a wonderful job and we should respect her as a Koorie woman so lay off her!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Black Steam train ~ thank you ~ I agree that more funding should be provided for teachers, literacy & numeracy problems, public transport & vehicle access and vehicle access in those areas in which the needs of aboriginal people appear to be overlooked. However, I wonder if your statement 'my daughter is black skinned. I can't very well ask her to look up to someone like Misty Jenkins as a role model' might be challenged, because young people choose all kinds of people, with varied skin colors and ethnic backgrounds to look up to. Many light skinned people admire Barack Obama & I don't think that admiration comes from the fact that he is dark skinned! I don't think your dark skinned aboriginal child will only look up to people who mirror her external look. Role models are so not because of their skin color, but because of their achievements, or something about them that we find admirable. I know that we live in a society that is focused upon the external look of a person ~ image being everything, especially in the media, but surely in the 21 century we can begin to look beyond the external and promote the intrinsic value of a person based on their behavior & characteristics, and this, I believe is what Anonymous (underneath your comment) is advocating. I personally think that it is the funding bodies who need to take stock of what they are doing. In their attempt to redress a balance between the financial & other support given to non-indigenous Australian and the lack of it to indigenous communities, they have been instrumental to some extent in polarizing indigenous people - who already had difficulty in rationalizing acceptance of their own people of mixed-race descent. If indigenous people of various skin colors - ranging from light to dark skin have difficulty accepting their own extended family, then how can 'white' Australia deal with the issues at stake? We can't change the past, which included inter-racial alliances between Aboriginals and non-aboriginals, and culminated in children born of both aboriginal and European descent. We can’t change the dilution of that ‘pure’ full blood race called Aboriginal. However I do think that in the struggle for acceptance of their identity many dark skinned aboriginals are attempting to hold onto their 'purity' (40,000 years which lacked genetic diversity), both as a way of clinging onto their already disintegrating culture and identity, which is in danger of being lost as the years go on. But I see this (and of course, I am speaking from a 'white' educated perspective) as a potentially fruitful thing because, since nothing can be done to maintain an original purity then the more these indigenous peoples mix with different races the more there will be less emphasis on skin color and racial/facial features and more prominence afforded to personal worth. I may be an idealist, but surely we would all be better off if we didn’t continually speak in binary oppositions? Also, genetic mixing may mean that these people, linked to an existing culture may become more able to cope with diseases that make them susceptible to dying earlier than their ‘white’ counterparts.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Dear Black steam train,

    I know Misty and I can categorically deny the fact that Misty Jenkins has ever received any kind of prestigious scholarship for her Aboriginal heritage. Anyone who knows her can say Misty has only ever been a positive role model (not that she's ever wanted to be a role model either!) She is the first person to acknowledge her mixed heritage and has Australian parents of mixed race, with her mother being Gunditjmara. I think your should make sure your facts are correct before attacking someone who has never asked to be a role model and never received any 'so called benefits' for her heritage. She had the opportunity to take a 'black place' at University, yet took a mainstream place to create more opportunity for more disadvantages students. Misty would be very hurt is she read these comments. She is currently working on the Aspiration Initiative and appealing to the government to try and get support for young Indigenous kids to stay at school. Someone like Misty deserves our support and not our criticism.

    We need to challenge this crazy idea that white-skinned aboriginal people only identify for some kind of political or financial benefit. It's certainly not the case with her.

    ReplyDelete
  20. For those interested, here is the transcript of the Federal Court of Australia decision on the case:
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/1103.html

    ReplyDelete
  21. @ anonymous (28/9/11 2.33PM) who wrote...
    'I think your should make sure your facts are correct before attacking someone who has never asked to be a role model and never received any 'so called benefits' for her heritage. '

    http://www.lowitja.org.au/crcah/misty-jenkins - funding by the CRC for Aboriginal Health International Program, funded by the Office of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health to support attending a conference

    http://www.rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk/page/charlie-perkins-scholarships-launched-at-rhodes-house - The Charlie Perkins Scholarships will provide full funding for living expenses, airfares and all tuition fees over a three-year period. The first scholarships have been funded by the Australian Government, the British Government (through the Chevening program), and Rio Tinto.

    I wonder if you would consider the above funding aboriginal specific?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Of course they are 'aboriginal specific' and the inaugural recipients of the Charlie Perkins Scholarships to Rhodes was awarded to Paul Gray, a Wiradjuri man and Christian Thompson from rural Queensland. See media article about their welcome to Oxford University: http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2010/s3073549.htm
    As an interesting contrast to Oxford's acceptance of Australian indigenous students, here is an article about the experiences of 'black students' at the University: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/apr/12/oxford-university-diversity-row-students

    ReplyDelete
  23. Black Steam Train again.

    Rather than engage with the friends of Misty Jenkins Inc group in back and forth banter, I'll issue a challenge. Get The Aspiration Initiative to work on the mission at Lake Tyers. A Victorian community of Koori people who are suffering greatly. The kids there need so much help, and, none is forthcoming. I actually contacted TIA to enquire about what they were doing down there for the kids. No reply as yet, same with all the other organisations I have contacted requesting the same.

    For the record, it is laughable if you think I hate white people. I am married to a white woman, and I probably 'get' the black white paradigm better than anyone else here, my twins are polar opposite. Black girl, white boy. Most of the mixed race families have siblings that follow this pattern, and my son is no less accepted than my daughter on mission because of his skin colour. But, he has the luxury of that white skin. And it is a priviledge in this day and age, a protective coating that he gets to wear that my daughter doesn't. He has his own struggles in life, but to say his are the same as my daughters is an insult to them both. He is disabled, she is not. She is black-skinned and very obviously Aboriginal, he is not. I don't have a problem understanding that, why do so many others? I challenge any white skinned urban Aborigine to come and spend a week down on mission and then tell me again that they are more entitled than these kids. While millions are poured into elite scholarships that most of these kids could never dream of attaining, the vast majority of the kids on mission live in a poverty most of you could probably only imagine. Not just being poor, but a poverty in all senses. Deprived of access to education, access to fresh food, a dignity on their own lands, and a disengagement from the wider community and treatment that is shameful, just utterly shameful.

    There is so much I could say, but, to be honest, I'm finding this much like a pointless exercise. I could write forever and still never convey even part of my experiences to you, all for what? trying to change your made up minds? I could draw a thousand comparisons, but the reality is this dialogue is achieving very little. The entitled ones will remain feeling entitled and now also perturbed by my interference (how dare I provide a voice of dissent, hey!), and I will try to figure out how to help my people, while hitting more dead ends than I care to count.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Black steam train,

    I really do understand where you are coming from. Communities like Lake Tyers are exactly where the Aspiration Initiative needs to be targeting. I think they are yet to see any government funding and have been struggling to get the program going - but I hear that the program is beginning now.

    I am frustrated at this concept that if anyone identifies as having an aboriginal heritage, then they must only be doing it for some sort of financial, professional or political gain. WHat about those who just want to acknowledge their heritage, but don't want any benefits? Does that mean that your 'lighter skinned' son should identify more with his white heritage over his aboriginal heritage because of the colour of his skin? Is he less entitled? No, of course not! Does that mean he is less eligible to apply for an aboriginal scholarship or even an 'identified' position in a workplace? No, of course not!

    I agree that dialogue like this does seem pointless but it is naive to assume that others have already made up their minds. You do have a voice. So use it.

    Also, seriously, Misty Jenkins wasn't a recipient of the Charlie Perkins Scholarship, and I seriously doubt she would ever apply for something like that. She has mainstream funding and is doing cancer research. Just like you wouldn't want people judging your kids, don't judge her before meeting her. She is actually a mixed-race person who equally acknowledges both her white and black family. I reckon she's got a big heart and I read that she got slammed by Andrew Bolt for just having an opinion, so lay off her. I'd hate to see her being vilified so much that she was scared to keep doin her work in the community.

    You are right about one thing - we do need to figure out how to help our people. But let's do this together. There's already too much in-fighting in the community.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I've been following this discussion with interest and thank those who have made a contribution. I agree with Anonymous of October 6 'There's already too much in-fighting in the community'; but I wonder why this is this so? Is it an issue of disadvantage over advantage? And, to be polemic here, if there was no 'advantage' in declaring yourself 'aboriginal', why would anyone do it? What would happen if being 'aboriginal' suddenly fell out of favor ~ for we must admit, that in the arts & football there is a certain kudos attributed to being of indigenous descent. Might declaring one's ab-originality by those not usually identified as such (ie, fair skinned and obviously privileged) be considered a form of support from those individuals who are, as Black Steam Train has said 'whiter than white' ~ meaning I suppose that they are generally quite removed from their aboriginal heritage and community? Unlike some of you I don't believe that the discussion is useless or time wasting. I've learned a lot from listening to the different voices in this discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  26. BlackSteamTrain again.

    Julie - I guess I am tired of talking. Rhetoric doesn't really feed children or tackle abuse, and, after so many years of the formation of these various 'think tanks' that do nothing but talk, never solve any real problems, I do tend now to be mindful when I spend spare time debating Indigenous Issues that it might just be time and energy better spent on the ground, fixing the issues.

    In a perfect world, I would like to see all Indigenous specific funding abolished. It should be needs based, especially when our current legal determination of Aboriginality is so open to corruption and does not make a determination between those in need, and, those who just have heritage.

    Anon, if you are involved at any great height with TIA, I urge you to rethink the proposal from your site. Under your current strategy, it would be useless to come to Lake Tyers. Identifying the kids who are already doing well in Year 8 is a waste of time for the truly disadvantaged. You need to start younger, and, focus more on literacy and numeracy. If you don't, you will run the risk of pandering to the White Aborigines, the well adjusted Urban types, who really do not face anywhere close to the disadvantage I am talking about. Discussing the merits of a web site with a choice of Undergraduate or Postgraduate Scholarships when the vast majority of truly disadvantaged kids are already struggling by Grade 2 with basic reading and writing and as time goes on just falling further and further behind their peers, is putting Aspiration and self-interest before the actual Initiatives that are needed.

    I don't mean to sound dismissive, however, after reading the proposal, I am sure that you will succeed only with those people who would have 'made it' anyway. If you want to truly address disadvantaged kids, I am happy to discuss, share experiences and find solutions, however, I will not allow these kids to be test subjects for a program that will not work and will only add another failure or lost opportunity to those who can least afford it.

    As for my children claiming benefits. My son would never qualify for University Studies. As I stated before, I will access funding based on his needs and where appropriate only. Disability Services funding and support is available to anyone with his disability, he gets no extra due to his heritage than anyone else with his level of needs. That is the way it should be.

    My daughter, well, if she chose to take up a scholarship that was not merit based, rather, race-based, I would feel ashamed as a father. My daughter would be taking the easy road out. I don't have any illusion about her priviledge amongst her peers. She has two parents, both educated and stable, neither drink or do drugs, and both have participated in the mainstream workforce. Although we are not 'wealthy', we are far from poor and have never had to endure crippling poverty. I am struggling to think of another kid on the mission who has it as good as her to be honest. None even come close.

    ReplyDelete
  27. For anyone reading this blog entry you may find it interesting that as of 14 November, 2011 there have been over 1,000 people who have read this article, and its interesting comments. We can never know if we are making a difference, but the dialogue should definitely continue.

    ReplyDelete