Saturday, July 10, 2010

The Waiting City SPOILER ALERT!

At the request of Denson Baker, Director of Photography of The Waiting City, who was concerned that my original review may have been a spoiler for film goers, I edited my blog post. However, since the film has been in general release for the past few days I've now re-posted my review. Don't read this if you are worried about having the narrative revealed! If you are going to read, you may also like to read my blog entry 'Without a man at your side or a child at your feet', which also relates in some ways to the film.
This morning (thanks to ACCA who gave me a free ticket), I saw the Australian film The Waiting City (Claire McCarthy, 2009). A number of people I'd spoken to who'd seen the film last week, didn't have much praise for it, but I have to say I really enjoyed it.
The storyline was believable, the acting superb and the interesting relationship between the Australian couple - Fiona Simmons (Radha Mitchell) and Ben Simmons (Joel Edgerton) who travel to India to pick up their adoptive daughter Lakshmi, and the Indian man - Krishna (Samrat Chakrabarti) who takes them back to the city in which their adopted daughter was born, is exemplary in its honesty and integrity. Indeed Krishna is pivotal in calling into question Fiona's barren status and encourages her to walk into the water before dusk to appeal to the goddess of fertility. What follows is a powerful scene in which Fiona, unsure whether she will become ill from coming in contact with water (Ben was quite ill after eating local food and water) not only walks into the river, but emerges her whole body. In this underwater slow motion sequence we have a moment to see Fiona's face and consider what she might be thinking whilst in this womb-like state.
Goddesses of one kind or another feature heavily in the film, none more so than the four armed Hindu goddess Kali, who as both creator and destroyer, represents time and change. In the film she comes to represent Fiona's state of mind, which is constantly changing. Fiona, who doesn't believe in the Christian God begins to believe in the numerous gods that abound in Hindu culture. Fiona is first exposed to the compelling Kali image on a postcard that a blind street vendor gives her. He says 'This is for you and your mother - is she standing next to you'? Of course, Fiona was alone, but it is through this potent and somewhat frightening goddess image, which she encounters again in a chapel and finally on the street ~ she falls down on her knees in awe of what she imagines is Kali reincarnated ~ a dark skinned woman with four arms waving, but what is, in reality, a woman carrying her son on her back; that the significance of the mother as a major symbol in India and as a priority in her own life, takes on greater significance.
After finally meeting their adoptive daughter Lakshmi, who is a sickly child suffering from a respiratory disease, Fiona reveals to Ben that she had earlier in their relationship aborted a pregnancy. They both desperately want this child to survive to save their disintegrating marriage and Fiona, forgoing all previous denials, prays to god for his goodness.
Although the child is extremely ill and really should not travel, all Fiona wants is to take the child back to Australia. A nun from the orphanage, who had nursed Lakshmi since she was a baby, rightly points out that Fiona must act out of love, not out of need. The child dies a few days later and is covered with a white cloth and bright flowers and sent ceremoniously down the river on a bamboo stretcher.
There were times in this film that I wondered about Ben, his desire to make music, to hold onto his marriage and his dependence upon Fiona, who, as a lawyer, is throughout most of the film working a case from her laptop and video-conferencing. I am at a loss to know what he did for employment.
Many questions are raised in this film about couples who adopt children from other cultures and the pressures on woman to have children, but ultimately I believe that the strength of this film lies in the fact that it reveals the abject poverty experienced by many Indians, the rubbish and other refuse that litters the city streets, people barely making a living, those who sleep on the streets, the utter overcrowding wherever you look. But it also shows the level of ritual, ceremony and music that appears to pervade everyday life and reveals to us the importance of family and community. The film was a little slow at times but overall I enjoyed the experience.

13 comments:

  1. Hello Julie,

    Many thanks for your kind words and support for The Waiting City.

    As one of the filmmakers of the film we have been incredibly careful about what information is disclosed by interviewers and reviewers to avoid any spoilers that would take away from our audiences experience.

    And unfortunately your blog here gives it all away.

    We urge you to please modify your blog to avoid spoiling the film for the audience, particularly since the film has yet to start it's official cinema run.

    Thank you, your understanding would be greatly appreciated.

    Kind regards

    Denson Baker ACS
    densonbakeracs@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Julie,

    Many thanks for your kind words and support for The Waiting City.

    As one of the filmmakers of the film we have been incredibly careful about what information is disclosed by interviewers and reviewers to avoid any spoilers that would take away from our audiences experience.

    And unfortunately your blog here gives it all away.

    We urge you to please modify your blog to avoid spoiling the film for the audience, particularly since the film has yet to start it's official cinema run.

    Thank you, your understanding would be greatly appreciated.

    Kind regards

    Denson Baker ACS
    densonbakeracs@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Denison,
    First of all may I say that as Director of Photography on this film you should be commended, secondly, whilst I am aware that my review is a spoiler of sorts, reviews are intended to give a particular viewpoint and encourage film goers to attend a movie - not discourage them. But, as you pointed out, the film has yet to start its official screening. I am at a loss as how to edit the review without totally destroying my critique, however I will attempt to do so, either tonight or tomorrow morning. Julie

    ReplyDelete
  4. Done. Sorry for misspelling your name Denson. I hope my editing is satisfactory.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Heh that was nice of you Julie.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't read a review if I am not wanting to be influenced about the film
    > before seeing it. I choose not to read your blog about 'I am love' until
    > after the event.
    Lauren

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes Steve, it was 'nice' of me to edit my review. I did think it strange that the distributors have made hundreds of preview tickets available so that people WILL talk about the film - presumably to generate interest, but are wary of those who write more extensive critques. I must admit though, perhaps my piece of writing was too extensive and may have spoilt it for some people.
    Lauren - ditto, I don't read film reviews, I like to make up my own mind. But, having said that, each reviewer has a different take on a film and I'm sure there was more in the film than what I focussed upon.

    ReplyDelete
  8. An interesting situation Julie. The cynic in me wonders if it is a new promotional strategy, a touch of controversy never goes astray. Do you know other reviewers in your position?
    The artist in me is empathetic as the handing over, or release, of a work to its audience can be traumatic, confusing and confronting to say the least. It's rather akin to a wedding for bringing out insecurities and control freaks!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Aliey, No - I don't know of any other reviewers and I'm tempted now to see what Margaret and David said on The Movie Show (god, is it still called that?)...I wonder if they would have left out major details when they were discussing the film. They are, of course, totally supportive of the Australian Film Industry, which certainly needs our support! The other night I saw 'Monkey Grip' (Ken Cameron, 1982 - I forgot how compelling Australian movies could be.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There is this from respected blogger Simon Miraudo..

    "Much of the joy of The Waiting City comes from the slow unraveling of the characters relationships. Indeed, the film’s final third introduces a whole new element that I dare not even hint towards, lest I ruin it for the rest of you. The Waiting City is a joyous experience; full of life and love. It makes a trend – even one that begets Sex and the City 2 – worthwhile. 4/5"

    And David Stratton gave the film 4 stars on David and Margaret at the movies.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Sebastian,
    I agree with Simon Miraudo, the unraveling of the characters relationships is interesting, but I suppose I found the social/economic aspects even more engaging, hence why I wrote the post about the plight of many people in India the day after editing my review. It does relate to the film without revealing the plot. My original review of the film will be posted on Friday after the film's general release.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I look forward to reading you re-posted critique Julie, however may I make one small request. Should you choose to divulge the entire plot and reveal the films ending please do your readers a favour and start by warning with a "spoiler alert"...

    The Chicago Sun-Times film critic Roger Ebert wrote an article entitled "Critics have no right to play spoiler" which contained spoilers and spoilers warnings. Ebert wrote:

    " The characters in movies do not always do what we would do. Sometimes they make choices that offend us. That is their right. It is our right to disagree with them. It is not our right, however, to destroy for others the experience of being as surprised by those choices as we were. A few years ago, I began to notice "spoiler warnings" on Web-based movie reviews -- a shorthand way of informing the reader that a key plot point was about to be revealed. Having heard from more than a few readers accusing me of telling too much of the story, I began using such warnings in my reviews."

    Kind regards

    Denson

    ReplyDelete
  13. Denson,
    Yes, beginning the piece of writing with 'spoiler alert' is a good idea and then it's up to the reader how much they wish to read.
    Julie

    ReplyDelete