Thanks to the curator Celestino Soddu and artist/assistant professor Daniela Sirbu (Canada) here is a photograph (taken by Daniela) of my works in the Generative Art 2013 exhibition held at LA TRIENNALE di Milano, Italy from 9-12 December last year. They took quite a novel approach in that they presented digital images and other works on painting easels. Contemporary art that references a more traditional one. Eleven artists were shown in the exhibition, however I was the only Australian whose work was represented.
Digital images by Julie Clarke, photograph by Daniela Sirbu (2013) |
Here is my rationale for the photographs:
My artworks are the product of the generative
approach in that, although my original intention was to simply photograph
people playing in the floodlit park at night, my camera’s internal function
automatically adjusted the exposure, which resulted in the distant figures
being captured in what looks like slow motion. By using Photoshop I selected
the body/ies of the people in the original photographs to highlight the section
I found most compelling since they are simultaneously represented as depicting movement
as well as stasis. If generative art is made with autonomous systems (computer
and digital apparatus) and depends largely on the intervention of a non-human
agent then these photographs may be considered generative, since a certain
amount of chance determined the outcome, which includes the colour saturation
of the yellow, high intensity artificial lights used to flood the park.The
images relate to early Futurism and the concepts of future, speed, technology
and the fact that the world is in constant movement. More importantly, the
photographs acutely reveal that it is only the mechanical eye (not the human
eye) that can capture exquisite, minute, human velocity. This too relates to generative
or emergent art because of the image’s reference to repetition, complexity, (dis)order
and the sometimes ambiguity of content such as that created in one of the photographs in which there was no dog and yet there appears to be one.
No comments:
Post a Comment