Our body, the identity that is us, is involved in an
intricate web of relationships – family, friends, colleagues and even peripheral
associations with the medical fraternity. So, in a sense this body that we call ‘ours’
belonging solely to us as sovereign subjects is not as autonomous as we might
think, for we are called forth during our life time not only to be responsible for
ourselves but also to others. I think this is part of the reason why the issue
of Euthanasia is so wrought with problems for those who are so racked with psychological
or physical pain through disease or injury and who no longer wish to be a burden
to themselves or others, and who wish to end their lives, feel that their
bodies are not their own to do with what they wish. Indeed our bodies are so
regulated and regimented through laws and convention that determine that we should not smoke,
drink alcohol or sugar laden soft drinks, we must exercise, eat the right
foods, reduce fats and maintain a healthy body and mind. Must! Because this
life, this body that we thought was ours, is NOT. Keep it in optimum condition so that when you die you can donate your organs to others. Of course, the alternative in
a biotechnological society is to keep individuals alive at whatever cost - wired up
to life-sustaining machinery; alone and unaware in a hospital intensive care
unit. I am reminded always when I think of the way frail life is maintained of the hundred year old wireheads in Bruce Sterling’s novel
Schismatrix (1985) - decayed but perfumed, feeble but propped up, filled with antibiotics, wired to
systems that cleaned their blood and enabled them to breath, whole ecosystems unto themselves they were no longer
human as we imagine the human – they were the dead, undead. Is this what we want? To be
kept alive even though life for us is no longer worth living? Why do we compel
people to continue a life lead only through and by medical technology? Why
must end life be medicalised?
Euthanasia is defined as the act of putting to death painlessly
or allowing a person to die by withholding medical assistance, it is also
defined as physician assistant suicide, or the painless killing of a patient
suffering from an incurable and painful disease or who is in an irreversible
coma. Euthanasia is also suicide, if a person decides that they want a painless
death without moderation or intervention by the medical fraternity. Euthanasia
is considered to be a good death, meaning I suppose that there is no prolonging
of unnecessary pain and suffering, no degeneration of our mental state, in
other words, Euthanasia allows people to die with dignity. I am almost positive
that most of us hold dearly to our self-respect and it is an esteem not only
associated with our physical appearance (such an emphasis in many cultures) but
a regard for our mental acumen, all important to us because pain and anguish
changes personality and the ‘we’ that is ourselves and the ‘we’ that others
know deteriorates when we are not in good health and we would all like to be,
at the end of our lives, as close as possible to what we might regard as our
true selves.
If our bodies were ours to do what we wish with them,
disconnected from that great web in which we are inculcated, and to a greater
extent they are, for people decide everyday to surgically modify body parts
through invasive surgery, take mood altering or necessary pharmaceuticals, reduce
their food intake and exercise so that they can be slim, indeed, they take this
body, their body as one of the only sites over which they feel they have some
control. Sometimes, perhaps in most cases, they consider the impact of their
self-governing behavior on the lives of others. Euthanasia maybe
an action that is carried out with informed consent or it may be at the
discretion of the attending doctor – yes, it may be illegal but the medical
profession has ways around this for the doctor can prescribe large doses of
morphine to help with pain, knowing full well that the dosage will kill the
person. Some may say that we learn invaluable things from our own suffering or
that of others, but what can be gained for those who have nothing more to learn
from this suffering? Some suffer and still cling desperately to life, never
wanting to let go and others refuse to suffer because whether they suffer or
not they know that the end game is death, but isn’t this true for us all?
But what of those people who have grown very old or who are
incapacitated and feel compelled to end their own lives with no means of doing
so? In order to have a ‘good’ death they must ensure that whatever means they
use must be final. Nothing worse than attempting suicide and discovering
afterwards that you are still alive and have created greater physical and
mental problems for yourself and others! There is that word 'others' again - our bodies are not our own! Apparently a lethal dose of Nembutal (Pentobarbital) is the drug of choice, but is illegal and most
difficult to acquire, which is why many older people commit suicide by hanging
themselves. Whilst suicide in Victoria,
Australia has been decriminalized, it is still illegal to assist someone in
suicide, hence why assisted Euthanasia is such a controversial issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment