Friday, April 29, 2011

Posthuman imagination

Mouth (moving image made with a Panasonic/Lumix digital camera. Julie Clarke (2011)

In a posthuman world identity becomes a paradox - image, after all IS everything - become who you want to become, but it's also nothing because your face and body may be changed at will as long as you have the funds for high end technological interface with Second Life, you've got so much money you can spend it on virtual clothes and accessories, a virtual house and land and even construct a business or territory to lord over in your resplendent avatar, fantasy you, oh you beautiful fantasy post, post human you. If you have access to advanced medical technologies (cosmetic surgery, liposuction, medical intervention) you can modify your visage, indeed, so complex a scenario that your arse can end up on your face, your rectum in an entirely different part of your body, your heart not your own but that of a pig. In a Deleuzian fantasy we could have a one all-purpose hole to eat and eliminate, regurgitate your own waste and devour it again - primate holding its own excrement looks out at the human who for all purposes keeps his animal nature at bay. The body merely a waste disposal unit, the body a machine more than human, but maybe more than, more than human in its ability to tolerate shit. And your breast, not of your mother but already inculcated into self, forever psychically attached to your own suckling mouth, may be redesigned to project from any part of your body, enclosed beneath a sheer top - well that's got to seduce someone, even if it's only yourself. Language from the mouth, undecipherable, incoherent, base, abject, discarded as pure dribble, leaks from the closed orifice in a scream of 'Not me, not post human! And yet the cry IS remake me, place me on the autopsy table, reassemble the fragmented pieces into something different, something other, because the prior configuration, damaged, deranged, no longer functions. My mouth, culture/nurture all rolled into the one gesture of yearning and longing remains mute in some insidious landscape of desire not of my making at all. If the libidinal band glows hot then it does so in fits and bursts, heating up and cooling down in this make-shift body, neither human, animal or machine, but all as one in a mad symphony of the post human imagination.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Romance (part 2)

Because I'm in email contact with a couple of friends struggling with lost love or loneliness I thought I'd return to the thread and continue my discussion of romance.
Last night I watched Jennifer Byrne presents Love along with Panellists: Andrew Goldsmith, Posie Graeme Evan, Mark Colvin and Toby Scmitz who agreed that book lovers will tell you that love on the page can feel as powerful as the real thing. If this is so then romance has as much to do with imagination than anything else. As far as I can determine romance is not necessarily about sex, as one might assume but actually about unrequited love, distance, simultaneous pleasure and pain, longing, deferring the sexual act or even not about sex at all. It was even suggested at one stage that perhaps we desire the pain, the intensity of feeling that romance arouses. Lovers are invariably absent when you desire their presence and it's this yearning that fuels desire.
I wrote to one of my friends last week that longing, which I call romance, seems to me to be something that cannot really be defined, but is bound up in some magical moment. Maybe we desire the desire, or the feeling of longing more than the actual event, since the event in itself cannot really satisfy the human desire to want? In other words if IT can 't be satiated then we probably get more satisfaction with the intensity of the feelings, which are prolonged, rather than in the sexual act, which is often fleeting. This idea appears to be supported by what the panellists said last night. My conclusion thus far is that desire and romance is borne out of the fact that we want to experience heightened feelings, depths of loneliness, exquisite pain - any emotion that takes us away from ordinary life, which may be flat in comparison to the myriad of complex feelings associated with romance and love. Reading a book about love is one way of 'experiencing' romance without actually having to engage with another - many of us have been through love affairs and been scarred by the experience; our mind riddled with a blunted affect that in turn produces a decrease in feelings and enjoyment for everyday life.
Since romance is not easy to find (but sex generally is) many turn to the safe space of a book in order to be carried away into the realm of romance. I must admit to having never done this and can't imagine romance on the page could be anything like real life. However, having said that, I do admit to becoming thoroughly involved in an ongoing exchange of email messages during 2009, but that was because I knew the source of the romantic texts was a flesh and blood person.
One of the female panelists said that there was nothing more intimate than being alone by yourself reading a book. I call that intimacy with oneself and romance feeds that intimacy. It appears that romance is less about the other and more about self feeling and self interest. No, I can hear you saying, it's about the other. Sure, the love interest is the source of the romance, the magician who appears to have conjured up these feelings from the depth of your soul and when that romance (often combined with sexual activity) continues, even with it's rising waves and eventual crashes there's an easiness that is not encountered when the closeness is disrupted. Long after the relationship is over people hold onto the thought of the love interest, because they were the catalyst to romance. But I imagine the person who has lost love is playing out all kinds of scenarios in their mind to resurrect the intensity of feeling they achieved with their lover and there's some rarefied emotions and delightful pain involved that becomes as addictive and desired as the real romance.
I'm a true believer in the notion that we need to be seduced and we wish to be seducers. Seduction and romance should not be perceived as negative, there need be no-one spirited away that does not want to give themselves over to the act of seduction. Maybe romance or the feeling of romance, with its twists and turns is a way of surrendering to seduction of self and other?

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

EASTER - That's All Folks!

If you're looking at the counter on the right, which has clicked over to more than 24,000 views since I went out this morning, I should tell you that Google Analytics actually says there have been 28,615 page views of this blog since August 2009, so the counter is always going to be 4,000 views out of touch. Never mind. This mornings cold weather has turned into a beautiful day and I really enjoyed being out in the sun. Two of the Magpies turned up five minutes ago, a little early for their 4.30 pm feed, but that's probably because they missed out on eating this morning. I worked out how to take short movie clips on my Panasonic Lumix digital camera and so with a little luck tomorrow I'll try and post the 5 second movie I made yesterday. I did try and post it here last night but with dial up it was taking way too long to load. Will try at Uni tomorrow because the computers are super fast. Well, that's Easter over for another year. So much for the idea of rebirth, rejuvenation and resting, which appears to have tossed aside, along with silver Easter egg wrappers.

Noise, noise, noise

Wanted to write a blog post but currently putting up with infernal noise from the gardeners who are running whipper snippers, blowers and lawn movers simultaneously. Almost unbearable. I'll be forced to go out rather than listen to well on two hours of noise. They usually arrive on a Wednesday, but have decided to intrude into Easter Tuesday quietness! Not even the Magpies can bear to turn up and eat their bread. I suppose putting up with the noise once per week is the price we have to pay for enjoying such a lovely garden. Even so, this is all I can write because I'm totally distracted. Enjoy Steve's latest post and image.

Latest Steve Middleton image

Untitled. Steve Middleton (2011)

monoculture and perfection I

I wanted to briefly inject into this thread a note about perfection and monoculture, a subject much larger than it appears.

Imagine a perfect hamburger, if you can. And imagine it eaten fifty million times a day in more than one hundred countries, and the effort involved in not only cooking and packaging, but farming and processing and transporting ingredients for one meal that tastes the same, everywhere, twenty billion times a year.

Perfection is often thought of as rare, but its original meaning, from Latin, is finished, and from the Greek, teleos, complete. Thomas Aquinas introduced the idea that perfection is something so good that nothing of the kind could be better; something perfectly serving its purpose. Many have learned from modern capitalism the meaning of redundant, of being superfluous to perfection, an idea borrowed from mathematics.

A perfect number is one divisible by numbers that themselves add up to the number. Six, for example, is divisible by one, two, and three, and 1+2+3=6. If the sum of the divisors is greater than the number itself, as, for example, the divisors of the number twelve are, the number is more than, or superfluous to, perfection (plus quam perfecti).

Ideas of perfection, of perfect divisibility, of just enough, of excluding the superfluous, are intrinsic to monoculture. There is no distinction, in capitalist monoculture, between what is essential and what is profitable. In modern capitalism, thrift is the new waste. Anything superfluous to the moment is unprofitably redundant, and therefore excluded. The (JIT) Toyota Production System excludes diversity from the soil in which wheat is grown, the clover upon which cattle graze, as surely as it excludes excess inventory from manufacturing processes.

Ideas about perfection are so bound up with monoculture that diversity and superfluity and redundancy are not so much excluded as discarded, useless and undesired. But a monoculture is a perfection of unison, a plainsong. And I wonder how harmony or even discord is possible, without some accompanying change in perspective on perfection.


(this post was edited on 2011.04.27 to simplify the paragraph about perfect numbers)

Monday, April 25, 2011

Latest stats for the blog

Since Steve posted his article Capitalism and Monoculture  on April 15, 2011 it's amassed 71 page views through Google, on a par with Climate Change Forum Geelong 2011 - very few questions answered, March 26, which also had 71 page views. Both of these posts were beaten by Prosh ~ dots and a dash! posted on August 19, 2010 with 162 page views, 2011 seasonal flu vaccine, April 3, 2011,  97  and Andrew Bolt/Bindi Cole/Indigenous politics, April 7, 2011 with 81 page views for the month. It's obviously quite difficult to come up with something more interesting than partially naked University students (the Prosh photo has been viewed by nearly 700 people)!

ANZAC DAY 2011

On the 16 July, 1917 my grandfather, Charles Winter Clarke enlisted into the Australian Imperial Force and on the 21 November 1917 embarked with the 4th Light Horse Regiment, 30th Reinforcements on the HMAT A71 Nestor to fight in WW1. Prior to enlisting he was a forty four year old farrier who was a teacher  at the Melbourne Veterinary College (hospital for horses and dogs).
The battle honors of the 4th Light Horse Brigade (Australian Mounted Division) were: Anzac, Defence of Anzac, Suvla, Sari Bair, Gallipoli 1915, Egypt 1915-17, Gaza-Beersheba, El Mughar, Nebi Samwil, Jerusalem, Jordan (Es Salt), Megiddo, Nablus, Sharon, Damascus, Palestine 1917-18, Messines 1917, Ypres 1917, Broodeseinde, Passchendale, Lys, Kemmel, Marne 1918, Tardenois, France and Flanders 1916-18, Egypt, Gallipoli, Sinai, Palestine, Western Front. They were involved in the following campaigns: Palestine: First Battle of Gaza, Second Battle of Gaza, Third Battle of Gaza, Beersheba, Jerusalem, Jericho, Es Salt, Megiddo and Damascus.

My father, David Henry Clarke enlisted into the Australian Army on 12 June 1940 and served with the 2/11 Field Regiment until his discharge on 5 November 1945. He fought in Suez, Palestine and other fronts. He was wounded but survived. I didn't know my father well, I know only that like many people who went to war he did not care to speak about it. Both my grandfather and my father were repatriated back to Australia - I suppose they may be considered lucky.

Out of the fog of this Anzac Day morning I place their photographs here as a tribute to their service and contribution. I don't think that doing so in any war glorifies war! How can war be glorious? You only have to read Robert Lawrence Binyon's poem  For the Fallen to hear the pain that was experienced by those who lost loved one and those who always feared that they would hear the worst. This is only a small part of the poem.

View of fog from my balcony at 7.47 am 25.04.2011


They shall grow not old, as we that are left
grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the
years condemn.
At the going down of the sun
and in the morning
We will remember them.



Last year on the 26 April 2010, a day after Anzac Day I wrote the following (excerpt) on my blog after watching the soldiers marching in the parade:

I don't know who these men are except that they were soldiers. They marched with their medals and their memories. Many in the crowd who had gathered to show their recognition, respect and gratitude, clapped their hands ~ what else can be done? Some shouted out or waved an Australian flag on the end of a stick. It's a small gesture. Media chatter advocating that ANZAC Day was a celebration of war and of the deeds of 'white men' dissolved in the overwhelming silence. It was a solemn occasion, as the soldiers marched and the people watched. I tried to get a sense of what people were thinking. Their faces, serious and strained ~ many would have already attended the Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance ~ it was a cold morning, but not as cold at 11am as it would have been at five...I thought, of course about my father and his father, but as I looked at those marching I could only see young men ~ too young, sent to war, to fight, to die ~ if not physically then inside, where the pain still lay. And it was on their faces ~ eyes ahead, or off in the distance ~ in their own thoughts and I cried just briefly for all those lost to war or pain. I think that for many, these soldiers, who have been through a horrendous experience that they just can't talk about, represent their own life struggles ~ and so, we see in them the courage that we too must draw upon each day.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Silent scream

Silent Scream. Julie Clarke (2011)
It begins somewhere, in the gut or the spine, in the brain stem at the base of the skull. Makes its way into the chest and throat and then bursts forth. Sometimes there's no sound, it's an inner scream that can't expel itself into the outside world, it just lodges in the jaw and fixes the mouth in a hideous grimace. The teeth are always involved, they add a little edge to the feeling, the lips stretched tightly across that worn down bite, the nostrils a little flared. The tongue appears to have no role in this audible or inaudible expression, which catches itself on the upper palate. I find myself sometimes in a scream. It's more a measure of frustration, as if I must make some sound and then, when the sound refuses to manifest it's enough to just to let the body articulate the shriek. Innocent X is doing it amidst ecclesiastical finery, but it's Munch's scream that depicts the true anxiety, echoed in the distorted, angular face and dizzying landscape. Is ET Spielberg's scream - the anxiety of the alien who wants to phone home and yet Earth is where his heart is, connected in a psychic way to Elliot, the child who will die if he doesn't let go? And let go we must - sometimes even before we get involved, and it's the inner scream that will enable us to continue.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Uninvited guest - Ms Mantis

Praying mantis: Photograph by Laura Feeger (April 22, 2011)
There was one guest that we really were not expecting yesterday at my birthday celebration, but it was welcome just the same. It was discovered on the Camellia plant near my balcony by Laura, my son's girlfriend and when it was brought it inside it caused a bit of a stir as it crawled around;  first on hands, then on bodies.  In my excitement I thought it was a Katydid. Obviously I didn't inspect the mantis close enough. Eventually it was returned to the garden where Laura took photos of it. I love that the scientific name Mantodea comes from the Greek words μάντις meaning a prophet - so appropriate for Good Friday?

Web etiquette?

Although I'm pleased that there are 5,511 links to my site I am continually fascinated and sometimes a little annoyed that people are able to lift information or quote from my blog posts and place it on their website without advising me that they have used the information and, rather than acknowledging the source of the material they just simply provide a link. Sure, I do that too, but I at least mention the name of the author and website where the information emanated. I suppose website etiquette differs from person to person?
Google Analytics allows me to discover which websites have permanent links to posts on this blog and this morning I've found that a number of website are using the material or parts of the material, such as a short quote from my Andrew Bolt/Indigenous Australians is on the Culture Language website, however they don't mention my name just place the link. Other sites, such as Elevate Difference which have an excerpt of a review I did of Shannon Bell's book Fast Feminism at least name me as author and provide a link to the original article. Other sites, such as Omniars out of Italy has provided a permanent link to my article on the Australian artist Patricia Piccinini as does Syneme, who have used parts of my essay on Spectacle of the Mind performances and have provided a link to this blog. Life123 has also posted a link to my article on Carbon Tax. I'm amazed that my short article in which I mentioned the word crimethink actually ended up on the trend.tv -  http://trendr.tv/trend/crimethink site. I wondered why there were so many hits for my photo of Melbourne University students running naked through campus during Prosh Week last year and then I found this permanent link on connect.in.com 
which probably draws some viewers.
I still don't understand what the 110,000 impressions and 1,600 clicks on this blog mean for the past month, nor do I know why a robot.txt blocks entry to some of my blog posts.
I should just mention that although I having a bit of a whinge this morning I thoroughly enjoyed my afternoon/evening birthday celebration yesterday and thanks to everyone who sent me happy birthday wishes.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Happy birthday to me!

It's my birthday and the first time in my life it's fallen on Good Friday. It's a solemn day on the Christian calendar, since it marks Christ's crucifixion and death at Calvary. Somber too, because consumers cannot prostrate themselves on the altar of retail outlets, sacrifice their hard earned money on entertainments beyond their own abode, nor can they enter any other establishment since everything is shut. Canonical stipulation requires that all parishioners or not, must do absolutely nothing on this holy of holy days.
In light of this 'absolutely nothing to do' except contemplate redemption hard won by Christ day and the fact that it was my birthday I decided I would celebrate in fine spirits with family and friends. We begin the festivities at 3pm today - nothing to do with the fact that Christ was supposed to have died at that time, I just thought it would be fun to have a celebratory afternoon tea and the mix of Buddhist, atheist, Krishna, Catholic, lapsed Catholic, pagan and agnostic, with a bit of Jedi Knight thrown in might make for a fun afternoon.
I note, with a smile on my face that I share my 22 April birthday with the following people: Jack Nicholson (actor), Aaron Spelling (film and television producer), John Waters (actor), Roman Coppolo (Director), Robert Elswit (cinematographer), Robin Bartlett (actress), Bettie Page (model and pin up queen), Immanuel Kant (philosopher), Guillermo Cabrera Infante (novelist), OMadame de Staël (french romanticist), Paul Davies (physicist),  Robert Oppenheimer (Manhattan Project), Odilon Reddon (symbolist artist),  James Stirling (architect). Peter Frampton (musician), Daniel Johns (musician), Charles Mingus (Jazz musician), Pope Alexander VIII and Antoine de Bourbon (King of France, 1600s)- fine company indeed!
Well, may I say to all readers, I hope you have a happy and restful Easter.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Scrying the other

Scrying #1: Julie Clarke 2011
Entered into a little scrying this morning. Yes scrying - but not as in the magic practice of trying to see into the future, but a kind of mirror-gazing in which you relax, look deeply into your own eyes and see what  is revealed. The theory is,  if you keeping looking into your own eyes you enter a state of unconsciousness that reveals all your masks and perhaps even the faces you had in another incarnation. But this so-called state of unconsciousness has got to be a little suspect because you  always remain conscious of something. Since I'm in the practice of meditating at least once per day I'm more adept at scrying and within about 4 seconds I see the mirror image of my face disappear before my eyes. I become faceless. Longer staring produces a myriad of faces, all mine, distorted into strange mutations that include one eye being closer to the other, my nose elongating, flattening or becoming porcine like, and the furrows in my brow deepening and lengthening. The sometimes disconcerting facial images that appear and then recede into other faces are animated, even though I know I am not moving any part of my face. Sometimes I see a pale yellow aura around my head, sometimes my mouth disappears or my image jumps out at me in a 3D effect. Always I see aspects of myself. Of course, its all an illusion, and according to Giovanni Caputo is caused by Troxler fading that occurs in the periphery while staring at a central fixation. Troxler fading is a phenomenon of visual perception and was discovered by Ignaz Paul Vital Troxler in 1804. I find it an interesting exercise to undertake. It reminds me of the fluidity of identity and the various faces we present to others. Indeed the 'other' faces of oneself and other are pronounced and prominent when we stare long enough in the mirror.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Romance

I was thinking about romance. It entered my mind via stealth, rather than in any real obvious way. And then it was there as both word and feeling. But I couldn't quite pin it down and maybe it can't really be pinned down, and that's what so magical about it. Oscar Wilde wrote To love oneself is the beginning of a life-long romance and maybe that's so, but it wasn't this kind of romance I was thinking of, or was it?  I was watching television last night in a dreamy state (I'd woken too early that morning and I was by this time in a soft stupor, open, vulnerable) heard the presenter mention the romantic poets Wordsworth and Blake and their desire to address intuition and emotion, rather than logic. I remembered my blog post last year called 'All is risk' and how my emotions are almost always linked with the natural world and in that case the sound of rain outside and condensation on my kitchen window. Romance here distilled in minute drops of water; each fragile spherical mass a particle of thought, a strange ectoplasm - romance yes, but in a most unusual way.  My tired mind probed minute aspects of the week to discover when the romance seed was planted. Since I felt ill for much of the time, I wondered whether it was my vulnerability to the world that had made my inner body call to be lifted up and away from the  commonplace, to escape to something more, to happen on an epiphanous moment - but is that romance?  The more I think about it, the more I realize romance (or the thought of it) arises through external provocation, which in turn produces internal arousal.  It has entered my psyche and eats the moments with a voracious hunger. I always thought I was a realist, perhaps I'm a romantic?

Sunday, April 17, 2011

AUT(O)PTICS(O)MA: Julie Clarke - Beornn McCarthy © (2011)


Installed in pieces, Julie Clarke’s Aut(o)ptics(o)ma operates like a museual body: a collection of objects, body-parts, and faculties arranged in a whole that playfully challenges the spectator to find and create edifices of meaning over a ruinous fragmentation. The title of the work is an assemblage of words: autoptic, referring to evidence ‘seen with one’s own eyes’, a kind of personal, self-surveillance or testimony; soma, or body; and parentheses which perhaps refer to the fragmentary and experimental nature of a work that draws on the shapes and forms of orifices and uncanny gaps in knowledge. With its multiple orifices, sensuous curves, bruises and still-life colours, Aut(o)ptics(o)ma portrays a femininised sphere of meaning in which the body is consumed before the mirror by both spectators and the feminine self. It reshapes and dehumanises the reclining nude, an art genre that is at least as old as Giorgione's The Sleeping Venus (1510), in order to present a collage-like assemblage of the feminine body rocked by the horror and criminality of selection and normativity. In such a subversion of artistic codes, the work draws on the aesthetics of horror most memorably explored by Mary Shelley in Frankenstein (1818). In this novel, the eponymous scientist intends to fashion a ‘beautiful’ life out of a ‘thing’, but in drearily beholding his reclined creation, he is startled to discover a ‘catastrophe’, a nameless, posthuman monster, a feminized revenant or body-in-parts with its ‘dull yellow eye’ and a ‘proportion’ that only makes a mockery of normativity. Julie Clarke’s creation harks back to Frankenstein’s monster. Rather than fleshy body-parts surgically stitched together, in Aut(o)ptics(o)ma we find a number of digital photographs held together by a series of translucent, diode-like pins. Somehow, in the midst of this assemblage, Clarke finds a convincing way to mirror herself that defies univocal desires and confronts digital technology with the sheer natural and visual plasticity of the feminine body that appears to resist normativity wherever and however it appears.
As such, this artwork may remind us of Barbara Kruger’s Untitled (The Body is a Battleground) (1989). Intellectually and artistically, this work can be located with the writings of feminist theorists like Judith Butler, Elizabeth Grosz, and Julia Kristeva, whose understanding of the abject is clearly evidenced in this work. In Bodies that Matter: on the discursive limits of “sex” (1993), Judith Butler presents a critical analysis of Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytical notion of the phallus and of his understanding of the mirror stage in which the child seizes an imaginary phallus to become a subject, ‘an inchoate collection of desires’. In this interesting reading of Lacan, Butler insists on the imaginary reality of the body missing in Lacan’s account, and argues that because power is itself plastic we should alert ourselves to an understanding of body-and-language-in-pieces that 'opens up anatomy—and sexual difference itself—as a site of proliferative resignifications'. In her own body-in-pieces, Clarke also appears to be confronting what the Slovenian philosopher Bojana Kunst calls ‘a world without secrets, bodies without organs, naked flesh and its fragile potentiality crushed by commercial, popular, scientific and aesthetic pressures’ (1999). Aut(o)ptics(o)ma is a forensic and autoptic presentation of a body—the artist’s own body—crushed and bruised and fragmented with the duration and force of these very pressures, ‘commercial, popular, scientific and aesthetic’. The evidence for this attack is clear in the artist’s own personal testimony. At the same time, the body in this art and the art in this body are finding a way to overcome or outplay these pressures, to win back critically and artistically a kind of proliferative power. Aut(o)ptics(o)ma appears to locate a resistance to the pressures of the outside in the sexual difference of anatomy, in a fleshy subversion that can never be completely reduced to a digital or material machine, and finally in the thinking of outsides undertaken by eco-feminists who have welcomed a new understanding of what Clarke considers an ‘alien landscape’, a kind of posthuman body which has never been human.
___________________
Beornn McCarthy is a PhD student and Masters Graduate at the University of Melbourne. He has lectured and tutored in many subjects in English literature. His PhD is about the life and writings of Isaac D’Israeli: “Curiosities of Romanticism: Isaac D’Israeli's Literary Collections and the Political Unconscious of Emancipation". Writing on Romanticism, he remains a ragpicker at heart. Interested in politics and contemporary theory and criticism, he is currently working on theories of parasites, collection and Gothic literature, Romanticism and Jewish identity, and animal studies. In his spare time he is the manager and curator of the GSA Printroom Gallery at the University of Melbourne, a space for solo-exhibitions of the artworks of current and recent graduate students who work with digital media.

burning vanities: unmaking and making the world

I raised the Dark Ages in a previous post, and in one before that, in the most general and vernacular sense of separating history into an Age of Reason and all history that came before, by implication several ages of unreason, of superstition, demagoguery and fear. And religious conflict so intense that at the moment the Catholic Church emerged triumphant from its battle with earthly powers it lost the war for the hearts and minds of people in the great reformations, or Renaissance, preceding the European Enlightenment.

The Dark Ages then refer in part to a triumphant universal Church, and its efforts to supplant diversity in human life, especially diversity of thought, with Christian monoculture. In Medieval culture Lent was an important period of prayer, repentance, charity and self-denial leading to Easter, and the death and resurrection of God. In the period before Lent, all rich food and drink had to be discarded, and its consumption in a giant party preceding Lent, and involving the whole community, is considered the origin of carnival.

The Roman festivals of Saturnalia and Bacchanalia may be the precursors of Italian carnival, originating themselves perhaps in the Dionysia and Oriental festivals of ancient Greece. While medieval pageants and festivals assumed a Christian tone, carnival was additionally the celebration of medieval folk culture based on local, pre-Christian, observances.

In Medieval Florence carnival offered opportunities for demonstrations of patrician largesse, and power. The Medici and other patrician families are known to have supported the efforts of lower class Florentines to stage entertainments like mock battles, horse and buffalo racing, re-enactments of history and myth, and other frivolities, together with a bonfire in the Piazza della Signoria on Shrove Tuesday to mark the Florentine carnival's end.

The end of the fifteenth century was an apocalyptic time in Florence. The Medici had fled, and the power of the patricians reduced by, the annexation of Florence by France. A Christian republic was declared, with God as the head of state, and the Dominicans of the Monastery of Saint Mark became the dominant republican faction. The Dominicans also seized control over the Florentine carnival season, re-organising it it exclude all unchristian things. The last Dominican republican Shrove Tuesday bonfire, in 1498, was their greatest achievement of all.

It resembled an octagonal pyramid, ninety feet high, topped with an image of Satan, with stratified firewood representing the seven levels of hell, more devils inhabiting its base. Under Satan artifacts classified by their intensity of sinfulness: paintings on canvas and wood; statues of women by great masters like Donatello; games and amusements of all kinds; musical instruments and scores; ornaments, make-up, mirrors, perfumes; books and manuscripts (amongst them lavish editions of Dante's Inferno); masks, wigs, and carnival ornaments. A vision of hell, of Lucifer and the seven deadly sins enthroned upon a snake, adorned with busts of contemporary and historical Florentine women, the literary works of Petrarch, Virgil, Ovid, Tibullus, Catullus and Terence, contemporary works of rhetoric and poetry, vanities and distractions of all kind, including those of carnival itself, confiscated in Florence from its residents over the previous twelve months.

Medieval times were diverse beyond imagination. Twelfth century chronicler William of Newburgh, an Augustinian Canon from Yorkshire, England wrote "one would not easily believe that corpses could rise out of their graves to terrify the living, were there not so many cases supported by ample testimony." In the Medieval mind living and dead were in coalition to such an extent that living and dead commingled physically at times. The dead stalked the world of the living, and the living explored the afterlife of the dead. Dante's Inferno lay upon the Bonfire of Vanities not so much for being fiction, but for its perceived inaccuracy compared to Dominican accounts.

The Shrove Tuesday bonfire of 1498 was the greatest of all bonfires of vanities in medieval Florence. The Sunday before, charismatic Dominican Friar Giralamo Savonarola had mounted a pulpit erected in the Piazza San Marco, and, while thousands prayed, invited his enemies, and Pope Alexander VI, to pray to God to strike Savonarola dead right there. A few years previously the charismatic Friar had made a pilgrimage to Heaven itself, from where he returned, after outwitting the Devil with logic, climbing jewel encrusted walls of Paradise to the throne of the Virgin, receiving a crown and the promise of an era of prosperity, and a message from God that

"Whereas Florence has been placed in the centre of Italy, like a heart in the midst of the body, God has chosen to select her, that she might be the centre from which this prophetic announcement should be spread abroad all Italy"

1498 was a year of famine in Florence, which Savonarola blamed on Pope Alexander VI, Rodrigo Borgia, whose name became a byword for corruption. Savonarola preached:

"In these days, prelates and preachers are chained to the earth by the love of earthly things. The care of souls is no longer their concern. They are content with the receipt of revenue. The preachers preach to please princes and to be praised by them. They have done worse. They have not only destroyed the Church of God. They have built up a new Church after their own pattern. Go to Rome and see! In the mansions of the great prelates there is no concern save for poetry and the oratorical art. Go thither and see! Thou shalt find them all with the books of the humanities in their hands and telling one another that they can guide mens’ souls by means of Virgil, Horace and Cicero..."

Pope Alexander condemned Savonarola's sermons, forbade him to preach, and issued an excommunication, proclamations contested by Savonarola's Dominicans in the Roman Curial Courts.

Savonarola offered, like Descartes a century later, ontological proof of a benevolent God who, providing human life with a working mind, would not then let it be deceived. Since the heaven revealed in Savonarola's pilgrimage to it was perfect it followed that his vision of it was also perfect. Contrary visions, especially those arising from human knowledge and reason following from experience of only the natural world, were therefore artifices of the vanity of those who experienced them. For truth was, eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge impaired for all time the ability of humans to be perfect, and so it followed that the ideas and knowledge of human beings were inevitably imperfect, and any contrary argument arose from a known imperfection: vanity.

That the dead could rise from their graves to cry out against the living by name and pollute them with all manner of misfortune and disease was common knowledge. Archaeologists find everywhere in Europe remains of medieval dead buried (or perhaps reburied), decapitated, with heads placed between their legs to prevent them from walking amongst the living. The idea that the words and works of the dead reached from their grave to pollute the already imperfect living, appears, by comparison, not so extreme.

Christian visionaries, wandering mendicants, and even prophets, had burned vanities in Florence before. But those had been itinerants arriving at carnival time, who afterward went on their way. Savonarola controlled the city's principal monastery, San Marco, itself recently adorned with the works of Fra Angelico. Savonarola became the spiritual leader of the Christian republic of Florence after the Medici family was exiled. Under his spiritual guidance the city warred upon Florence's former vassal Pisa, whose citizens defeated the Florentines in 1497. War led to shortages, especially of food, and Savonarola, and his vision of Florentine perfection, which had included a glorious victory over the Pisans, lost popular support.

On the Sunday preceding the Shrove Tuesday of 1498 Savonarola stood in the Piazza San Marco, where a large crowd had gathered, waiting for God to strike him dead. Nearby, in the Piazza della Signoria, stood the largest bonfire of vanities Florence's festival season had ever produced, waiting to burn. It had been a year in the making, symbolizing nothing less than the unmaking of the contemporary world, and its remaking in the unpolluted perfection of Christian monoculture.

Olive green, red and blue

I think if the government wants to discourage young people from eating take-away food to avoid obesity and diabetes in later life, then perhaps they should consider requesting fast food companies and those who market soft drinks and chocolate bars enclose their products in olive green wrappers -  the color of the 'new' cigarette packets, designed to discourage people from smoking.  Likewise, if olive green is supposed to be so unappealing (I think the Greens may disagree with them), maybe the government should insist that labels on beer and wine bottles also be this color, since so many injuries and deaths are caused by young people (but not only the young) who get drunk and then drive their cars. Hey, why not insist that all cars be painted olive green to put people off driving and inevitable accident and injury. If the government really believes that cigarette smoking is so bad for us why don't they just ban cigarettes and tobacco products all together? Probably because they collect over $8 billion dollars a year in revenue and many of our services are provided for by the fact that people are addicted to smoking. This new labeling is just pure hypocrisy it's just a way that the government can prove that it's doing something to address the health issues associated with smoking, but if you think about it, they're not really doing that much!  Fact is that people imbibe all kinds of things and substances that are not good for their body, and also absorb ideas that might not be condoned as well. People have been smoking since 5000 BC and over one billion people throughout the world currently use tobacco for recreational use, either as something they  inhale into their lungs or via snuff, which is insufflated through their nostrils. It's considered by many to be one of life's little pleasures. To others, smokers are simply people with certain personality traits, although the personality differences between smokers and non-smokers is usually small. And whilst I'm pontificating I would just like to say what kind of a weird world do we live in, in which a anti-smoking advertisement can show bright red blood on a handkerchief coughed up by a male smoker, but disguises menstruation blood on sanitary pads and tampon advertisements as blue dye? I do get it. We (smokers) are supposed to be frightened by the sight of blood because it's associated with  pain, trauma and death, but portraying menstrual blood as blue liquid is just wrong - it dilutes the pain that many women experience during menstruation under a purity rubric that may be associated with the white pad, but is certainly not experienced by the woman. OK, enough now, the sun is shining through the beautiful olive green leaves near my porch and it's time for me to get on with the day.

Friday, April 15, 2011

capitalism and monoculture

I want to take up an issue raised in my last post: that I don't think there has been such a mystical political movement as the Greens since the Dark Ages.

Power is everywhere. A political movement seeks to concentrate power to further an agenda. Often that agenda is simply to concentrate more power than other political movements. An oligarchy is an extreme example of the concentration of power forever, for example in a cartel. A movement of political protest is an extreme example of the concentration of power for a moment, for example to end one instance of injustice. Power is everywhere, but its intensity is not everywhere the same. Power is focused, magnified, directed.

The green movement presents as a commonality of action rather than ideology. The major religions: Hindu, Buddhist, Christianity, Islam, participate in it for reasons of their own. And so do a multitude of other, minority faiths. And organizations and individuals in great numbers. Speaking in unison is not the same as being harmonious, and I hesitate to privilege one voice over others. So let Donald Worster do that for me

...the progressive, secular materialist philosophy on which modern life rests, indeed on which Western civilization has rested for the past three hundred years, is deeply flawed and ultimately destructive to ourselves and the whole fabric of life on the planet.
- Donald Worster, “The Shaky Ground of Sustainability,” in George Sessions, Deep
Ecology for the 21st Century (Boston: Shambhala, 1995) pp. 417–27)

Deeply flawed philosophy, ultimately destructive materialism, threats to the whole fabric, are polemics common in discourses of political change. Progressive, secular, materialist, conservative, are labels applicable to many times, places, situations and ideas. The idea that societies are materialistic to their detriment is by no means a new one. Assertions that materialism represents a mortal threat to people does not present a new class of problem. The formation of broad social coalitions to solve problems arising from materialism is not a new action. The abandonment and/or destruction of material goods is not a novel solution. The unravelling of an entire cosmology is not a new catastrophe.

The green movement is a coalition indistinguishable from many geopolitical grass roots movement, for instance International Workers of the World or the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. It is international, is active in all possible political forums, and has a charter binding the coalition to six guiding principles, the first of which is ecological wisdom.

Ecosophy, or ecological wisdom, is a neologism coined by Arne Naess and Felix Guattari "By an ecosophy I mean a philosophy of ecological harmony or equilibrium", Arne Naess told the Third World Future Research Conference in Bucharest in 1972. Guattari and Naess went their separate philosophical ways and it is not my intent to reunite them here. But I do want to unpack the simple philosophical framework, offered by Naess and others in 1984, called The Platform Principles of the Deep Ecology Movement.

Deep simply means over time. Lots of time, up to all there is. The first three points of the platform principles of ecosophy outline the problem and its scope. The next four suggest a course of action. The last dictates the circumstances in which an obligation arises to act.

1. The well-being and flourishing of human and nonhuman Life on Earth have value in themselves (synonyms: intrinsic value, inherent value). These values are independent of the usefulness of the nonhuman world for human purposes.
2. Richness and diversity of life forms contribute to the realizations of these values and are also values in themselves.
3. Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital human needs.
4. The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease of human population. The flourishing of nonhuman life requires such a decrease.
5. Present human interference with the nonhuman world is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening.
6. Policies must therefore be changed. These policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. The resulting state of affairs will be deeply different from the present.
7. The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality (dwelling in situations of inherent value) rather than adhering to an increasingly higher standard of living. There will be a profound awareness of the difference between big and great.
8. Those who subscribe to the foregoing points have an obligation to directly or indirectly try to implement the necessary changes.

Ecosophy is a field of discourse in which biology and ethics intersect. I say ethics because it seems to me that Rachel Carson's Silent Spring proposes a situation where birds no longer exist, the silent spring, and asks "is it ethical for birds not to exist?"

This is a bigger, more complex problem than it appears. The absence of birds illuminates an ecosphere, in which all living things are entangled. Not only birds, but many living things associated with birds are rendered non-existent in the silent spring. The problem "is it ethical for birds not to exist?" provides an ecosphere with a moral dimension. These issues were previously veiled by piecemeal descriptions of nature. The unveiled ecosphere offers no ready solution to the moral problem it poses: "is it ethical for birds not to exist?"

Morality, Rousseau theorized, arises from a human desire not to witness suffering. A moral position is one that eschews suffering. It is therefore possible to answer the question Is it ethical for birds not to exist? with a simple statement: It is wrong to cause suffering, an answer implying that once suffering is detected - there exists a situation leading to birds not existing - it is necessary to act to end it.

I don't think there has been such a mystical political movement as the Greens since the Dark Ages, a thought to unpack in a subsequent post. But I want to briefly situate that thought, and its unpacking, on some familiar ground.

Globalized capitalism produces monoculture. Although it is common to talk about pluralistic society monoculture is produced as a matter of fact. Carson's Silent Spring arises from a pluralistic monoculture. There is no overt, and perhaps no covert, political insistence upon monoculture - in Australia multiculture appears in the platform principles of most political parties- but in fact global capitalism (Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Caterpillar Tractors, Windows, Firefox) is producing monoculture. Diversity is hand made, but monoculture is (re)produced everywhere. The platform principles of ecosophy could be easily expanded as humans have no right to impose monoculture, not even to satisfy vital needs. Lest there be a Silent Spring.


Thursday, April 14, 2011

Aut(o)ptics(o)ma: Julie Clarke 2011

iPhone photo of Aut(o)ptics(o)ma, reproduced with kind permission from Beornn McCarthy 14.04.2011

Thanks to Beornn McCarthy I now have a document of the twenty-two (A3 and A4) digital images I installed in the Graduate Centre Print Room gallery wall yesterday.  He took this image on his iPhone. In total, the images are a little wider and a little longer than my body. If you would like to view Aut(o)ptics(o)ma in the flesh, please visit the gallery in the 1888 Building, Graduate Centre, near the corner of Grattan and Swanston Streets, Melbourne from 10 am to 5pm, Monday to Friday, 18 April to 18 May.

سلام

Good to see that other's are taking notice of this blog and do not fear the infidel.  I found my post about the French Government's ban on the hijab on Kashifiat's blog (Kashif Hafeez Siddiqui is the author) and then on another blog called Tea Break, a website out of Pakistan. I guess any individual who writes a blog can copy and paste from one site to another without seeking permission. (Salaam - Peace) سلام

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

This afternoon

Twenty-two digital images installed on a soft black surface.
It's all in the pins I think.
Lunch with Beornn underneath the Plane Tree -
Stelarc, Kristeva, Grosz and psycho-analytic theory.
The sun held
and only a few small droplets of rain
slipped through the thick leaf canopy.

Fashion

I thought I'd post this photograph because I haven't posted one for a while. This was taken outside a retail shop in Bourke Street, Melbourne in September 2009. It's called 'Fashion' and is just one example of the diversity of clothing worn by people in Melbourne. I have to admit that I've taken few photographs over the past two months. I appear to have been spending much of my time just getting old photos reading for exhibition. Today I'll be setting up some new work and I hope to post a photo here (sometime soon) of what it looks like on the gallery wall.
I was slow to start this morning. Yesterday around this time I was struggling with an umbrella in the pouring rain and whilst waiting for the tram I was deluged by a wave splashed up by a passing truck that hit with speed, a large pool of water that stretched a meter from gutter to road. My trousers from the knee down were soaked, as were my shoes. I had no choice but to continue my journey to Melbourne Uni. More rain is forecast so I'd better take my umbrella to Uni today.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

I think I think

I haven't posted for a while. But I have been writing a lot. And a series of posts about deep ecology is coming. I'm still feeling my way with a blog. Using the perpendicular pronoun in a sentence is more fraught than I imagined . Who cares what I think? I think.

I am attempting a synthesis of deep ecology with bodies without organs. I am aggrieved beyond words by the ecosophists who decided to turn their backs upon modern philosophy. Although I don't care enough to argue with them, I do think that the ecosphere cannot exist without at least one thousand plateaus.

I always thought that deep ecology meant just that, a philosophy unfolding over a very long time. And understood that the very long time was many many multiples of my own. So it is disappointing to find a project begun less than thirty years ago to synthesize the best of the rest with a simple but profound ecophilosophy abandoned, because the rest has been somewhat arbitrarily judged irredeemably anthropocentric. And careerist.

But who cares what I think? I think. I think!

French Government ban on hijab - offensive to women!

I find it offensive that the French Government has placed a ban on Muslim women wearing a hijab. In a country of about 5 million Muslims, only about 2000 women wear the full veil and the powers that be, have decided that they know best and these women must be saved. Or could it be that  the government  wants to save the French people from this most terrible of atrocities, a female body that cannot be seen .
There are a number of assumptions in the government's decision to act.  They  infer that women who wear the hijab are being oppressed not only by their husband, but also Islam. Heaven forbid that these women are cognizant beings able to make decisions for themselves. If  the hijab is a symbol of male power and oppression, the question arises why should Muslim women be punished for their compliance?  The argument then follows, if these women are not being oppressed and choose to wear the hijab or burka then they must be rebels flaunting western culture and  as such, should be punished. It seems either way that men in power have decided that these women must be punished  for acquiescence to Islam or their lack of obedience to male power structures in western societies. Never mind  Islam, how dare you defy our will!
Non-Mulsim women throughout the world have the freedom to choose their own style of clothing, which tends more and more to reveal rather than cover their bodily parts - note the recent trend of women wearing short shorts, which occasionally creates an almost pornographic revealing of the pubis and buttocks of the wearer and the tops that get lower and lower, revealing more and more of female breasts.
But we live in a capitalists society where the body and bodily parts are highly marketable and women are encouraged to show their wares. The Muslim woman who covers her body transgresses male desire to see and female (but not all female) desire that others desire to look at them; male desire considered primary! 
I'm beginning to think that countries that ban the hijab do so not because they actually think the item of clothing is divisive in a religious sense because there's already a division between Islam and Christianity, but because the hijab has become like a red rag to a bull that flags the notion, we dare to be different in a different way than you have condoned!
And where do western, educated women in gender neutral jobs figure in all of this? Used to competing in obvious and non-obvious ways with their body (after all, isn't that what people see first - groomed, beautiful and as perfect as they can be with up to the minute fashions) they know that they are no challenge to those  not selling. How can they be better, thinner, more beautiful than the woman who keeps it all under wraps? The ground lines may have shifted, but from what I can ascertain, men are still holding the chalk.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

A load of old rubbish!

The Select Committee on the Scrutiny of New Taxes (set up by the Australian Government) is looking into Carbon Tax pricing mechanisms and so far has received 36 submissions. This doesn't appear to be a huge amount given the outrage by individuals for or against the proposed carbon reduction scheme. Maybe it's just easier for some to write a slogan on a piece of board and turn up to shout in a protest?
And talking about pollution, Bruce Guthrie's article Bright lights, filthy city in the Age this morning whinges about people discarding fast-food containers, drink bottles, cigarette butts and packs as well as ATM slips onto Melbourne streets. And whose being blamed? Goths, homeless people and scantily clad late-night revellers...it's pretty clear we're not talking about Collins Street bankers or Spring Street apartment dwellers, he said. There are 300,000 visitors to Melbourne on the weekends and they can't all be bogans (his word, not mine).
If the City of Melbourne is concerned about the amount of rubbish discarded on city streets on Friday and Saturday nights and with men urinating in doorways, maybe they should consider using some of the $170 million dollars they receive every year in rates from businesses and individuals to install more rubbish bins and public toilets. They publicize the fact that they have 28 public toilets (and intend to build 5 more by June 2011), but I really don't know where they are, the only ones I'm aware of (that is not one of those disgusting underground ones that no one in their right mind would visit) is around the corner from the Town Hall in Collins Street and those at Federation Square and Queen Vic Centre.
If Council wants Melbourne to be perceived as a locale brimming with life and activity that attracts overseas visitors then diversity of population has to be part of the attraction and that means the inclusion of  'desirables' as well as 'undesirables'. We live in a society that equates having a good time with drinking alcohol and I don't think that attitude is going to change anytime soon. Carbon Tax? Maybe the government should consider a Fun Tax?

Saturday, April 9, 2011

GLOBAL SHUFFLE Review + memory piece

DISTANT PAST. Sometime in 1992 just after I met Stelarc he introduced me to his friend Garry Shepherd - composer, artist, musician and pyrotechnics performance artist. We became friends and there were occasions when I visited his studio space, come living quarters in one of the upper floors of Commerce House, Melbourne. I remember sleeping over one night because I was too tired to take a taxi home. Garry slept in his bunk, a bed made up high on a wooden scaffold in an adjoining room. I slept on the couch in the studio apartment, which was filled to the brim with books, records, videos, computers, sound recording equipment, artworks and stage props left over from one of the performances by Melbourne Band Boom, Crash, Opera who Garry had worked with in the late 1980s.
Anyway, staying over that particular night remains a significant memory because I barely slept. The couch I lay on faced huge bare windows and all I could see was rooftops and  moon light that flooded the room. From about two o'clock onwards shadowy figures passed outside the windows and then disappeared from view. Garry informed me that it was usual for residents of Commerce House  - artists and Goths, to meet on the roof, play role games, dance or just hang together. This was Melbourne’s underground. They lived in or around Flinders Street and Flinders Lane. Considered vaguely Goth myself (though hadn't I always worn black) it seemed appropriate that Garry allowed me (just once) to do some of the filming for him of people dancing at the Goth club in a downstairs venue in Swanston Street, Melbourne.
In 1994 Garry had a program on Chanel 31 called TOE: Theory of Everything and he visited me at my place in Hawthorn to conduct an interview. I still remember saying that I wouldn’t be on camera (I’ve always been happier behind, rather than in front of a camera), but was happy for him to record what I said and to film my artwork. Garry and I ran into each other regularly over the next few years, usually around Nicholas Building where he lived after he left Commerce House or at his favorite coffee shop in Degraves Street  lane way and we’d have long chats about his Cyberfaeries project. One day around the end of the millennium I stopped running into Garry because he'd disappeared up to the hills.
FAST FORWARD. Yesterday I received in the mail a copy of Global Shuffle a documentary by Garry (music, editing and direction by him) and I watched it last night.
REWIND. About once a week I walk through the foyer of the Sydney Myer Asia Centre at the University of Melbourne and have been captured by the dozen or so male Asian students who rehearse an energetic dance in which they contort their bodies, do amazing movements with their feet, undertake almost impossible acrobatics like twirling on one hand - arm outstretched or twirling around on their heads. They’re amazing. But it wasn’t until I saw Global Shuffle last night that I could even put a name to this kind of dancing. I’d been calling it break dancing. Occasionally I’d be in the city and see some young men perform these amazing feats combined with dance. So now I know what the dance actually is. It’s the Melbourne Shuffle, or rather, the Global Shuffle. But I’m sure now after watching the documentary that this underground dance style emanated from Melbourne at the beginning of the 90s.
FAST FORWARD.  So I’m watching the documentary and Garry’s showing someone around Melbourne. They stop at Peril Underground an alternative music shop in Elizabeth Street, Melbourne where I first met (in the early 90s.) and had amazing conversations about viruses, techno-music and Stelarc with Australian sound artist, Darrin Verhagin (Shinjuku Thief). I still listen to some of Darrin's earliest CDs. I suppose they'd fall within the Industrial/Goth genre. 
Global Shuffle documents footage of Melbourne shufflers dancing in Brunswick Street, at the Espy in St.Kilda, at Commerce House, and some old TV footage of National Nine News from 1994 when the police strip-searched about 400 people attending Tasty Night Club, which was held in the basement at Commerce House.
When I saw the footage of shufflers at The Lounge in Swanston Street I was beginning to think that this documentary was in some strange way a trace of my life. The Lounge was a place I would regularly frequent, but I guess all art students who attended RMIT did – I know the Fringe crowd met there often. We’d see the bands, the art and listen to poetry readings. Somewhere along the way the clientele of The Lounge changed and I stopped going there.
The trace becomes more significant as I continue to watch Global Shuffle in that there’s footage of Don’t Shoot the Messenger and one of its members, our own Steven Middleton (friend who writes for this blog) gives a brief wave (my god, he looks so young – this was a few years before I met him) and then later on in the documentary he appears again wearing a red jacket.
If you love the driving beat of mechanical sounds, then you’ll love this DVD. It’s filled to the brim with techno-music, persistent strobes, dark spaces and hypnotic laser lights. It’s thoroughly mesmerizing, not just because I’m from Melbourne and because the marginal life of underground Melbourne touched mine, but because it’s filled with vibrant colors that gleam in night’s dark sky and a city invaded by lone shufflers dancing unconsciously in empty alleyways and stark city car parks. It's alternative Melbourne at its best!
But the documentary is not only about Melbourne shufflers and the shufflers' frenetic state, there’s some  quieter, softer clips of shufflers all over the world. Snow covered ground in Russia - young people dancing on an ice white surface that doesn’t slow down their feet, they just breathe faster and dance in time with an internal rhythm; their cold breath hanging in the crisp, cool air. The Kremlin 2009 shuffle competition, people dancing inside and out of a stadium and somehow the large statue of Lenin with his feet outstretched, mirrors the stance of the lone boy dancer, if you can imagine his movement FROZEN STILL FRAME. The eerie mist of the snowy landscape somehow akin to the glow of Melbourne's interior dance club lights. 
PRESENT. I'm thinking this documentary is not only about the Melbourne Shufflers its a record of Garry's life for that period. It describes in many ways his absolute determination to record Melbourne's alternative culture, the energy and utter creativity of our people as well as his own creativity. I hear that Global Shuffle is coming to a film festival near you very soon, catch it if you can it's well worth a look.

Friday, April 8, 2011

Congratulations to Petra Nolan and Garry Shepherd

Congratulations to my friend Dr. (if you don't mind, brains as well as beauty) Petra Nolan, who won second prize in the 2011 AAMI Golden Slipper Day at Rosehill Gardens Racecourse in Sydney on 2 April. I must say she looked absolutely gorgeous in her red dress and stunning red hat (not sure why she didn't win!)
Congratulations are also in order for my friend Garry Shepherd (he lives in the hills so I don't see him often) whose documentary entitled Global Shuffle (2010) has been accepted for screening at a number of independent film festivals this year. My copy has just arrived in the mail and I hope to watch it tonight or tomorrow and give readers of this blog a bit of review.
I should also be congratulated because I managed to have my seasonal flu vaccine without too much drama. Well, actually, I lied. I had the injection and felt woosy, so the nurse ushered me to the bed and then I had an anxiety attack. She placed a cool, wet towel on my forehead and gave me a Chupa Chups (a sweet round lolly on a stick) and made me a hot cup of tea. I stayed on the bed for about twenty minutes, then I was allowed to leave the surgery. I've been given strict instructions to have a quite time over the next few days. So, that's what I'm going to do.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Andrew Bolt/Bindi Cole/Indigenous politics, Black Lives Matter

I am still struggling with the complex issues raised by the Andrew Bolt trial. I work with mixed-heritage Indigenous students and understand the relationship they have with family and country. I understand the legacy they inherited from invasion and dispossession. I understand their struggle of being betwixt and between in a country that divides 'blackfella' from 'whitefella'. But really, Dylon Bird's article in this morning's Age doesn't make things any clearer. Firstly, there is a reason why definitions of Aboriginality has shifted from biological determinism to social, community and cultural aspects and part of this reason is because it would be extremely difficult for any pale skinned aboriginal, such as those individuals mentioned in Andrew Bolt's article, to prove by genetic testing that they are of aboriginal descent. Secondly, I think he's misguided if he thinks that Bindi Cole's art is not 'political'. When she constructed the photo (above) of her family members, their faces covered with black paint, she was drawing attention to the fact that although she has fair skin she identifies as aboriginal - her paternal grandmother is part of the Stolen Generation. Cole's art draws attention to the fluidity of the indigenous person and that's admirable, but it also acutely addresses the ongoing struggle within Indigenous culture about individuals accused of being 'coconuts' - black on the outside, but white on the inside - an inversion of what Cole presented in her photograph. There's a certain contempt by dark skinned aboriginals for those with light skin who can pass for being white and who managed to avoid the prejudice, discrimination and resulting poverty of those called 'coon, 'boong' or 'Abo' (in the 60s and 70s), but who more recently (in the past two decades) claim their aboriginal heritage whilst gaining more opportunities. I find Cole's black face paint 'mask of aboriginality' troubling because it blatantly recalls the black face makeup used in 19th Century minstrel shows that created a stereotype of the American negro and because it appears divisive since it makes problematic the notion of authentic or counterfeit aboriginals. This emphasis on the 'real' or 'not real' has become prominent in recent times, especially in relation to our Prime Minister and concern as to whether or not we are seeing the 'real' Julia. The 'real' appears always as that which is hidden and all we have to do is somehow uncover it! When white performers covered their faces in black shoe polish in minstrel shows they were appropriating not only the culture (music, song and dance) of the American negro, but were also proliferating negative attitudes ascribed to them, such as servitude, primitiveness or simple mindedness. There is a confusing aspect to Cole's work in which she, as a fair skinned aboriginal is covering her face with black identity to represent her inner aboriginal heritage, which she, by her very act ascribes to skin color. A paradox exists here, either the aboriginal identity is about skin color or it isn't! I would be less troubled if a dark skinned aboriginal painted their face white! In the latter we might at least see that the mask represents the 'blackfella' whitewashed by our culture and that the eugenic policies of the 1937 Aboriginal Welfare Initial Conference of Commonwealth and State Aboriginal Authorities, the aims of which were: (a) To educate to white standard, children of the detribalized living near centers of white population, and subsequently to place them in employment in lucrative occupations, which will not bring them into economic or social conflict with the white community; (b) To keep the semi-civilized under a benevolent supervision in regard to employment, social and medical service in their own tribal areas. Small local reserves selected for tribal suitability should be provided in these tribal areas where unemployable natives may live as nearly as possible a normal tribal life, and unobjectionable tribal ceremonies may continue and to which employees may repair when unemployed. The ultimate destiny of these people should be their elevation to class (a); (c) To preserve as far as possible the uncivilized native in his normal tribal state by the establishment of inviolable reserves; each State or Territory determining for itself whether mission activities should be conducted on these reserves and the conditions under which they may be permitted. This has been almost fully enacted, with the exception of aboriginals from Western Australia, Northern Territory, South Australia and parts of Queensland who have not yet been westernized. I'm left wondering whether art, such as that made by Bindi Cole does anything to draw attention to the plight of these aborigines who live in regional and remote Australia and are still thought of as 'Abos', still considered inferior because of negative stereotypes generated about them in the media and who, according to a recent survey, still suffer from gross discrimination when they come to our cities. I hope that if nothing else, the Andrew Bolt case will further the discussion surrounding treatment of Indigenous peoples regardless of the color of their skin. 
As of 3pm 27 August, 2013 there has been 2.317 page views of this article.
Google Analytics shows that as at 12 March, 2014 there has been 2814 page views of this article. As of 6 July 2020, 3003 people have read this

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Organic and synthetic in beautiful harmony

Satin Bower Bird: http://petcaregt.com/blog/bowerbirds.html
Following from Steve's post and my own on Germaine Greer's little book On Rage in which she describes past and ongoing destruction of the Australian environment by the White man,  I would like to add that I believe we have much to learn from Indigenous cultures, particularly in relation to how we might respect the environment. Steve  mentioned, at the end of his post the Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess. 
Naess coined the term 'Deep Ecology' in 1972 to express the ideas that nature has intrinsic value, namely, value apart from its usefulness to human beings, and that all life forms should be allowed to flourish and fulfill their evolutionary destinies.The term has since come to signify both its advocates’ deeply felt spiritual connections to the earth’s living systems and ethical obligations to protect them, as well as the global environmental movement that bears its name. (from Bron Taylor, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh and Michael Zimmerman, Tulane University essay). It should be noted with respect that Naess's Deep Ecology was highly influenced by Silent Spring a book written in 1962 by Rachel Carson.
The Australian Greens recognize that Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Peoples have strong cultural and spiritual connections with the land and have for thousands of years cared for and protected  it. We would do well to listen to the wisdom of their elders in order to protect Australia, and stop the extinction of our flora and fauna, which is disappearing with unprecedented speed.  But having said that, no amount of negotiating and listening will remove our impact on the land for the past 200 years. I think that renewable energies, such as those garnered from wind, sunlight, rain and waves are only one aspect in the mix to reduce our energy emissions; but it will take more than that to 'save' our environment.
Ultimately, it must be a personal decision - use less, recycle and honor the people and environment around you, difficult I suppose in a society, which tends towards opulence, mass consumption and discarding the old in favor of the new! I liken humans  in a consumer society to the Bower bird who recycles things thrown away, whilst simultaneously being attracted by shiny things and other objects (bright colored pegs will do) to decorate its nest. The Bower bird shows us that the organic and synthetic can co-exist in beautiful harmony. If only we could achieve that.

Wind farms blow an ill wind

A Senate inquiry into wind farms heard evidence last week that the largest wind farm in Australia, at Waubra, near Ballarat, had been causing health problems for people living close by for the past two years. A doctor treating some told ABC-TV the cause was unknown, but its effect was measurable when the wind farms turbines were operating.

Victoria has the most polluting power station in the world, at Hazelwood, and a deadline of generating 25% of its electricity needs from renewable energy sources by 2020 to meet.

Waubra wind farm operator Acciona Energy told the Senate Inquiry they believed their neighbors health issues were real, but doubted the wind farm by itself caused them. Acciona Energy and other wind farm operators receive government grants through the Renewable Energy Target funding scheme. Another operator told the inquiry complaints about wind farms are so few they should be dismissed out of hand. But the new Liberal Victorian government is proposing a two kilometer buffer around wind farms, a suggestion that outraged environmental activists Friends of the Earth. Spokesperson Cam Walker told the ABC thousands of jobs and billions of dollars are on the line if wind farm operators cannot build near people's homes.

Victoria needs to boost energy supplies to cope with growing demand from an expanding population. The operators of the Hazelwood power station expect to be burning 18 million tonnes of coal each year for the next 25 years or more.

Aside from electricity, wind farms bring wealth and economic activity and steady income to country regions dependent upon the vagaries of drought and flooding rains. Some wind farms are community owned and operated, like the The Hepburn Community Wind Park Cooperative at Leonards Hill, south of Daylesford. As more wind farms are built the State will become more economically productive, and can expect a larger share of tax revenue for effort from the Commonwealth treasury as a result. Everyone is happy, and the establishment of large scale wind farms in regional Victoria looks for all the world like a grass-roots effort toward to a better society.

So why would the new Victorian government rock the boat, and slow the gravy train down?

Almost counter-intuitively, wind farms totter if not on the edge of sustainability then close enough to sweat about falling off.

The sun provides all the world's energy, one way or another. Burning coal and other fossil fuels releases energy stored since the sun shone on a very different, carboniferous age. The sun heats the earth and causes weather, waves, and the wind. While a rustic waterwheel or modern windmill takes some energy from those, the climate has some energy spare.

But energy taken from the weather by wind farms cannot be later put back, and in the opinion of geoscientists

"...climatic effects at maximum wind power extraction are similar in magnitude to those associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2"

and

"Given that only 0.03 TW of wind-derived electricity was produced in 2008, there is still substantial wind power development possible with relatively minor climatic impacts. However, future plans for large-scale wind power development must recognize the finite potential of the Earth system to generate kinetic wind energy." (pdf)

In other words, wind farms are only sustainable in the short term. If we build too many, the weather will change as if we burned twice the coal we do now. I'll say that again another way. There is a price for everything, and energy is no exception. Only a finite number of wind farms can exist before their numbers take too much energy out of the wind for it to keep on blowing the way it does now.

Australia has an abundance of cheap energy from coal, an accident of luck. But I don't know whether it is just to take wind from the sails of other nations on purpose, getting in first to maintain a comparative advantage.

I wonder what Murray Bookchin would have thought of this wind farm affair. "...the natural world itself is not cooptable. The complexity of organic and climatic processes still defies scientific control, just as the marketplace's drive to expand still defies social control" he wrote in 1991. Bookchin argued that the environmental movement was indistinguishable from economics premised upon a supposedly unavoidable conflict between insatiable needs and scarce natural resources, the so called Dismal Science of Thomas Carlyle.

In Enemy of the People, an 1882 play by Henrik Ibsen about a commercial enterprise that makes people ill, one character asserts that in moral matters the individual is superior to the multitude, which is easily led by demagoguery and the promise of easy money. While Ibsen has long since been claimed by the sisterhood as an early proponent of feminism in A Doll's House, Enemy of the People puts the individual at the centre of things, a distinctly humanist view.

And one that might be shared at the top of a new, Liberal, Victorian Government determined to stamp its mark.

Green politics is a posthuman, if not extropian, anti-humanist project that reverberates with themes of humility, introspection, and passivity consistent with the politics of European Feudalism. Green prophet Arne Næss taught that humans only had potential as part of a diverse whole, the ecosphere, where every thing, human, animal, vegetable and so on, has an equal right to be. I don't think there has been such a mystical political movement as the Greens since the Dark Ages. Which weren't really dark at all, just nothing much changed for hundreds of years.

Anathema to the humanist, reformist administration the Victorian Liberals aspire to be.